Gun Aid


The Ethiopian dictator, Mengistu, until then deadlocked in the war, was using the money the west gave him to buy sophisticated weapons from the Russians, and was now able to efficiently and viciously crush the opposition. Ethiopia, then the third poorest country in the world, suddenly had the largest, best equipped army on the African continent.

Telegraaf 4chan

Uit de Telegraaf

3 Dutch Politicians Targets of Terrorists Anonymous (ID: GuyRFboB) 10/02/21(Sat)11:09:34 No.341784330▶>>341785198

Last week, 9 people were arrested in the city of Eindhoven
8 of them have a mediterranean background and one of them has an Afghan background
They were training and preparing for a terror attack against Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte, right-wing opposition politician Thierry Baudet and another right-wing politician Geert Wilders
Thierry Baudet entered politics in 2017 and used to be the most popular right-wing politician, winning the 2019 Province Elections and First Chamber Elections
is known for his anti-EU, anti-immigration, anti-covid measures and anti vaccine positions
Geert Wilders has been in politics for a longer time and has gained much popularity and notoriety for his staunch anti-islam positions

Anonymous (ID: GuyRFboB) 10/02/21(Sat)11:25:31 No.341785357▶>>341785918

341785083 #
Baudet is based, he against vaccine mandate, covid measures, mass migration, wants to leave EU etc.
Wilders took the vaccine but is against mandate and measures too. He’s ultra pro-Israel though.

Anonymous (ID: pePQTODs) 10/02/21(Sat)11:30:15 No.341785651▶

341785083 #
Rutte has been prime minister (leader of the government) for the past ten years and is the NetherSwamp version of a RINO with a dash of Globohomo.
Baudet is /ourguy/ populist leader of a party for Netherlands first, anti immigration, anti European Union and recently hard core anti vax and Rona measures
Wilders is our resident ZOG controlled opposition. Been screaming for years about the Islamization of the NetherSwamp and muh Judeo Christian values.

Anonymous (ID: gbZG8has) 10/02/21(Sat)11:34:40 No.341785918▶
File: 5f3ff127bc66b5ccb46cf14ef(…).jpg (34 KB, 600×315)
34 KB

341785083 #
341785255 #
341785357 #
341785083 #
341785255 #
341785357 #

Mark Rutte is the globohomo cocksock of Klaus Schwab and sadly prime minister

Geert Wilders is controlled opposition, supposedly rightwing on immigration and EU but leftwing in everything else and absolutely useless. Decoy party

Thierry Baudet is /ourguy/ straight up hyperborean redpilled af and also visits this site. Loves the beauty of life and condemns all who try to destroy it. Met him couple of times, hes our only hope. Completely shunned by the media, the usual Nazi, sexist, racist propaganda.

On a cryptocurrency of dynamic supply

1 Setting the stage

1.1 The economy under the division of labour is a massive and massively complex system with immense degrees of freedom. Commie silliness notwithstanding, only money, an emergent computer of comparable capability, is equal to the task of daily optimising resources such as to fulfill demand to the greatest degree possible. Money alone can run such calculations at any reasonable speed.

1.2 Calculations need to be run in the moment as well as in time, hence the true and core function of money as a unit of account. Medium of exchange kind of follows but may be in principle separated, while store of value can be entirely separated at no cost to anyone.

1.3 It is extremely hard not to mess monetary calculations in time, but accounting relies on this being the case to an acceptable degree. Was value created or destroyed? Need a true standard in time to answer that.

1.4 The price of money is not the interest rate, but its purchasing power: how much “stuff” does a unit of currency buy you. When this price falls with time, you have inflation. If it increases with time, deflation.

1.5 A deflationary monetary standard makes it look as if companies lose money where they may not have: it sets a hurdle over which folks have to jump before they are allowed to see a nominal monetary gain. An inflationary standard, on the other hand, makes it look as if firms make money while sitting on ass.

1.6 True profit and loss accounting requires a stable standard, one that neither inflates nor deflates. Such a standard lets you know who is really adding value and who isn’t, so you can deal with the latter. Also, long-term planning and all that.

1.7 Hence, the optimal monetary standard is that which delivers a stable purchasing power, facilitating calculations in space and time.

1.8 Normal supply and demand interplay works for money just as well, but it is impossible to express the price of money in succinct terms (how to quantify the value of everything a unit of money buys?) so actual measurement is tricky.

1.9 Hence, ensuring a stable price of money in practice translates into ensuring every change in demand is met by an appropriate change in supply.

1.10 The only credible challenger to the current system of a centralised issuer of currency would be a decentralised system under the auspices of cryptocurrency. Alas, most of the time, the designers of these ingenuous tool just went with “fixed supply is good enough” and left it at that, making cryptocurrency a great store of value, but a shonky unit of account. How much worse this issue becomes when the user base is growing faster than the global economy (which of course it does).

1.11 Here’s how you fix this: you set up a savings pot and spending pot, and exchange between the two by conserving percentage of change, instead of total sum of the pots.

2 The Design

2.1 The new cryptocurrency is issued as two linked coins: the RedLek and the BlackLek. The issue of each is fixed at the start and no new units will ever be created exogenously (making allowances for technical needs of proof, such as they are).

2.2 You can only get more RedLeks by converting BlackLeks, and you can only get more BlackLeks by converting RedLeks. Such conversion can only be done within the portfolio, by the algorithm consulting the blockchain to calculate how many of either are currently on issue anywhere in the world, including those that other holders may have converted into, to the degree this is captured by your blockchain history.

2.3 Within these strictures, the exchange rate would be set such as to trade a given percentage increase of one for the same percentage decrease in of the other:

where DRL is the number of extra RedLeks you get, DBL is the number of BlackLeks you give up, and RLT0 and BLT0 are the total number of RedLeks and BlackLeks anywhere in the world just before the conversion. Don’t divide by zero. MAX becomes MIN if you switch from getting RedLeks to getting BlackLeks.

2.4 Note the hard floor of one in terms of RedLeks you gain for every BlackLek sacrificed, even if the global supply is titled a thousand to one against the former. In a sense, this ensures that there are always as many “phantom” RedLeks in the system as there are real BlackLeks at any time, and so the former can never go to zero (which would be a real risk after ICO before anyone can find anywhere to spend RedLeks on as per 3.7).

2.5 RedLeks can be transferred across portfolios as any other cryptocurrency unit can, hopefully with some anonymity, hopefully with some speed. BlackLeks live in people’s portfolios and can never be transferred across portfolios (except maybe once, at ICO, see 2.7). These can only be “transferred” by getting RedLeks across and having the other party convert in situ. In principle, if both portfolios share the same knowledge of the world, you can transfer the exact amount of BlackLeks anyway. In a sense, BlackLeks are the unit of account within the system, not a proper cryptocurrency at all.

2.6 The RedLek is the unit of account with a supply that will grow with the excess of demand for spending over changes in velocity. The BlackLek is the store of value, with a supply that will decrease as the economy grows, outdoing its fixed supply brethren in that function.

2.7 At ICO you can simply issue BlackLeks and have no RedLeks anywhere in the system at all, as these will be created in time when needed to spend. Otherwise, at ICO you sell RedLeks only, such as not to make a one-time exception to the “BlackLeks can’t transfer” rule. Be sure to back-solve for the appropriate number of BlackLeks being in the system (compared to those held by the issuer, as per 3.11) the nanosecond after sale when all portfolios convert everything into BlackLeks (3.5).

2.8 All done, you can stop reading now. Feel free to implement or share with those who might, but please keep the names of the coins as they are, give credit and do let me know of the ICO beforehand. Some free allocation wouldn’t be bad either, to be honest.

3 Why would this work?

3.1 If a set of decentralised issuers is to be prevented from hyperinflating the supply away, they must be subject to some form of a feedback mechanism (issuers can’t coordinate to maximise value). What stops holders from creating as many RedLeks as they can? The waiting game.

3.2 You can get more bang for your buck if you convert BlackLeks into RedLeks later than the others must. If you need to spend while the global supply of the former goes from 10 to 9, you’ll boost your supply of the latter by 11%. If you can wait and convert when the supply of BlackLeks goes from 9 to 8, you boost your RedLek stash by 12.5%, while giving up the same single BlackLek. So you wait, or at least try to.

3.3 Any holder has a finite supply of RedLeks and BlackLeks, hopefully no impact at all on the exchange rate, and can only spend the former. Assuming RedLeks are accepted as a means of payment (bit of an issue here, see 3.7), the more RedLeks are spent, the more the supply of BlackLeks dwindles, valorising the remaining units.

3.4 Some folks have high time preferences and don’t care about no waiting game. Probably not the profile of the usual early adopter of things like these, but if you want to make this money proper you’ll get to those spenders eventually. No problem, after all users hold just as many BlackLeks as their time preference dictate the system will be in equilibrium, and only create new money when time preferences across the entire user base increase, all else being equal. How about that, FRB?

3.5 You want others to spend as much as they can, but you should spend as little as you must, all the while keeping your entire portfolio in BlackLeks until such time as you need to spend something, at which time you convert. So, the portfolio will probably automatically do this for you, convert everything into BlackLeks and let you pay RedLeks without the need for you to do a thing, while always showing a (slowly growing) sum of RedLeks as balance. Will people even know what a BlackLek is?

3.6 The supply of RedLeks will increase with demand for spending (to the degree that velocity pickup does not suffice), but no further than strictly necessary to keep up with the spending needs of the economy / user base.

3.7 A major issue I can foresee is that the uptake of this currency would be even harder than the uptake of a standard shitcoin. The same mechanism that incentivises you to hold on to BlackLeks and not convert more than what you absolutely need to spend into RedLeks would make the uptake of the latter an uphill battle. And if RedLeks don’t circulate, BlackLeks are not worth anything. Not sure I have a good way out of this, just two bad options below. Hopefully the issue won’t be too pressing in practice, and people will be drawn to just another shitcoin. Strong anonymity would help getting this off the ground, as it did for Bitcoin.

3.8 One way to deal with 3.7 is to create a venue that only accepts RedLeks, with the relatively low effort one being an online predictions market where bets are placed and redeemed in RedLeks. A lottery of fair odds would be even lower effort.

3.9 Or the issuer can promise to use all (some?) the tethers he gets at ICO to intervene in the market and buy RedLeks when suitable (say so publicly). A simple autoregression will show a particularly bad day, which is your time to shine. At some point, the pot will run out though.

3.10 Or maybe the entire issue is being overthought. Perhaps the conflict between the incentive not to spend RedLeks and the incentive to get some value out of BlackLeks will settle into a nice equilibrium early on, and users will spend what they deem optimal, assuming they have some freedom to spend RedLeks anywhere.

3.11 Another issue is some genius keeping to himself a large stash of BlackLeks after the initial ICO, which would spook all holders far more than it does with a fixed supply coin (BlackLeks will dwindle in time, and your share will explode if you let it). If a holder has a large enough proportion of BlackLeks such to impact the exchange rate, the limitations of the system start to cede. In the extreme scenario of just one holder having all BlackLeks (assume away conversions for the sake of the argument), there would be nothing holding him back from printing trillions. Big stashes of BlackLeks left over from the ICO? Don’t do that.

3.12 Could a similar system be implemented in a centralised fashion, i.e. by some Central Bank out of ideas? Central Banks nowadays mostly target inflation. This is just a patch, a rough guide CBs rely on to determine when to amend the supply of money. The real goal, that of matching demand, is attempted only through the stabilisation of some proxy of purchasing power. The system I purpose here system would stabilise supply automatically, and no one would need to get into arguments on core inflation anymore.

3.13 The same issue re a large holder of BlackLeks as under 3.11 would come to the fore with a centralised issuer, but harder. So, a central authority using such a system would only work if that authority only functions as a central clearinghouse, tracking everyone’s BlackLek deposits, but holding little of their own (still centralised in the sense of acting as a single point of failure). Monetary Boards are a thing. The centralised version would certainly be unbound by scaling constraints, something I fear the decentralised version may not be able to replicate. No matter, make up for it in anonymity.

3.14 Final issue (heh, if only) is divisibility, and the extreme stress this system will place on BlackLeks to be divisible. In principle, if these are infinitely divisible there is no limit at all to the supply of RedLeks one can create if need be. But infinitely divisible units may not be feasible, even if only units of account, at which point one will need to calculate carefully the initial supply of BlackLeks at ICO. Assume you will conquer the world, she’ll be fine.

3.15 Will this work? Will the issue hyperinflate anyway? Will it ever take off as a spending tool? Will the system be self-adjusting or will the users fall prey to random panics? I don’t know for sure. I won’t be the commie I disparaged earlier, and claim to know enough about this mammoth system of monetary calculation to make predictions with confidence. Wouldn’t be bad to try though.

Paranormal 4chan

Learning LanguagesAnonymous 09/30/21(Thu)16:46:55 No.29900375   [Reply]>>29900405

Does learning languages make you smarter? If you learn a different language every year or so, would that boost your IQ points? I am not a native English speaker and those who learn a different language in mind country, tend to be smarter, more analytical thinkers. They understand and communicate better and they are more cultured. Excluding being cultured, I feel like learning languages actually makes you smarter, like physically as in neurons in your brains get stronger and shit.

>> Anonymous 09/30/21(Thu)16:48:52 No.29900382>>29900389

no. homos lucky enough to be raised in a bilingual household just convince themselves this to feel special. you cant change iq either.

>> Anonymous 09/30/21(Thu)16:50:42 No.29900389>>29900414

>>29900382 #
this,plenty of poeple speak more than 1 language and are just retards,its basically traduction of your language,how would that make you smarter?
you will just be smarter linguistically aka will start noticing patterns between langauges and similarities

>> Anonymous 09/30/21(Thu)16:53:37 No.29900405>>29900414

>>29900375 (OP) #
Don’t listen to the monolingual retards. Being bilingual is better. Pick a second language and master it. Make sure to use both regularly or you’ll start to lose them. I was raised bilingual and after only a couple of years of barely using one of them after high school, it started getting really rusty

>> Anonymous 09/30/21(Thu)16:55:01 No.29900414

>>29900389 #
english is a logical enough language anyway. it would probably only help if you were raised speaking something like arabic.

>>29900405 #
not monoligual.. nice cope faggot.

Check the source.


Rothschilds bow to Bogdanoffs
In contact with aliens
Possess psychic-like abilities
Control france with an iron but fair fist
Own castles & banks globally
Direct descendants of the ancient royal blood line
Will bankroll the first cities on Mars (Bogdangrad will be be the first city)
Own 99% of DNA editing research facilities on Earth
First designer babies will in all likelihood be Bogdanoff babies
both brothers said to have 215+ IQ, such intelligence on Earth has only existed deep in Tibetan monasteries & Area 51
Ancient Indian scriptures tell of two angels who will descend upon Earth and will bring an era of enlightenment and unprecedented technological progress with them
They own Nanobot R&D labs around the world
You likely have Bogdabots inside you right now
The Bogdanoffs are in regular communication with the Archangels Michael and Gabriel, forwarding the word of God to the Orthodox Church. Who do you think set up the meeting between the pope & the Orthodox high command (First meeting between the two organisations in over 1000 years) and arranged the Orthodox leader’s first trip to Antarctica in history literally a few days later to the Bogdanoff bunker in Wilkes land?
They learned fluent French in under a week
Nation states entrust their gold reserves with the twins. There’s no gold in Ft. Knox, only Ft. Bogdanoff
The twins are about 7 decades old, from the space-time reference point of the base human currently accepted by our society
In reality, they are timeless beings existing in all points of time and space from the big bang to the end of the universe. We don’t know their ultimate plans yet. We hope they’re benevolent beings.

340910943 (OP) #
rothschilds bow to the Bogdanoffs
in contact with aliens
rumoured to possess psychic abilities
control france with an iron first
own castles and banks all over the world
direct descendants of the ancient royal blood line
will bankroll the first cities on Mars (Bogdangrad will be the first city)
in the process of terraforming Pluto as their personal planet
own basically every DNA editing research ability on Earth
first designer babies will be Bogdanoff Babies
both said to have 400+ IQ
ancient Indian scriptures tell of two angels who will descend upon the Earth and will bring an era of enlightenment and unprecedented technological progress with them
These are the Bogdanoff twins
They own Nanobot R&D labs around the world
You likely have Bogdabots inside you right now
Every child has the mark of the Bogd implanted in them at birth
The Bogdanoffs are in regular communications with the Archangels Michael and Gabriel, forwarding the word of God to the Orthodox Church
Discovered the ark of the covenant
They learned fluent French in under a week
Zahi Hawass allows them full to the evidence of Atlantis within the pyramids
Nation states entrust their gold reserves with the twins. There’s no gold in Ft. Knox, only Ft. Bogdanoff
The twins are 67 years old, from the space-time reference point of the base human
In reality, they are timeless beings existing in all points of time and space from the big bang to the end of the universe
They have been able to access the Akashic record since birth, and have spoken about what they saw while they were newborns
The Bogdanoffs will guide humanity into a new age of wisdom, peace and love

bogdanoff plastic surgery


Ruttenek Hollandaban

Állam elleni bűncselekmény elkövetésével is meggyanúsította az ügyészség az un. Magyarok Felelős Nemzeti Kormánya vezetőit – írja a Központi Nyomozó Főügyészség közleménye.

Címlap Aktuális Krimi
Halállista: összeesküvést szőttek a magyar állam ellen? Itt az újabb gyanú
ma 16:41
Megosztás Megosztás

Döbbenetes dolgok hangzottak el a “PI-kör” fórumán, már állam elleni bűncselekmény miatt is felelniük kell / Fotó: youtube
Döbbenetes dolgok hangzottak el a “PI-kör” fórumán, már állam elleni bűncselekmény miatt is felelniük kell / Fotó: youtube

Állam elleni bűncselekmény elkövetésével is meggyanúsította az ügyészség az un. Magyarok Felelős Nemzeti Kormánya vezetőit – írja a Központi Nyomozó Főügyészség közleménye.

Ezeket látta már?

Xantus Barbara: „A pandémia alkalmazkodás művészetére tanított”

Rémület a nyíregyházi stadion körül: földrengésnek hitték a robbantást – A Blikk a helyszínen járt

Egyre keményebb furcsa részlet derül ki a magát „Magyarok Felelős Nemzeti Kormányának” nevező csoportról, amire a napokban csapott le a TEK és a nyomozó ügyészek: halálos ítéleteket aláíró „bírósága” volt, a halállistájukon állami vezetők, politikusok, bírák és Müller Cecília is szerepelt. Hogy kik voltak pontosan még a listán, itt nézheti meg!

A feltételezett elkövetőket hétfőn emberölés előkészületének gyanújával vették őrizetbe, ami kedden kiegészült alkotmányos rend erőszakos megváltoztatására irányuló bűntettel.

Az ügyészség szerint a gyanúsítottak létrehozták az úgynevezett Magyarok Felelős Nemzeti Kormánya nevű, az alkotmányos rend erőszakos megváltoztatására irányuló szervezetet, egyiküket bírói hatalommal ruházták fel, míg a másik gyanúsított feladata a végrehajtói hatalom megszervezése volt. A gyanúsítottak új “alkotmányt” is megfogalmaztak, melynek egyik pontja szerint a társadalom minden tagjának “mindazzal szemben, aki vagy ami megsérti az alkotmányos alapelvek előző pontokban megfogalmazott értékrendjét, joga és kötelessége a hűtlenség vádja nélkül akár élete árán is ellentmondani és ellenállni”.

A gyanúsítottak részben nyílt, részben konspirált tagságú szervezetet működtettek, amelyet a közösségi médiában is megjelenítettek. A gyanúsítottak – antiszemita nézeteik hangoztatása mellett – az alkotmányos rend erőszakos megváltoztatására konkrét intézkedéseket tettek, amikor tagságukat a gyűlésükön és az interneten keresztül közéleti szereplők megölésére hívták fel.

A nyomozó ügyészség indítványozta a gyanúsítottak letartóztatását, a kényszerintézkedés tárgyában a Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság nyomozási bírája dönt – közölte a Központi Nyomozó Főügyészség.