Het Nederlands: Een Middeleeuwse kunsttaal

“Waarom is het voor buitenlanders zo moeilijk om ‘u’ te zeggen? Wat is zo mooi aan ‘plat praten’? Wat maakt ‘tata’ tot het ideale woord? Bestaan er talen die mooier of lelijker zijn dan andere talen? Wat betekent ‘spreken met pien in de broek’ in het Twents? En waarom zegt een klein kind hardnekkig ‘poef’ tegen een poes, terwijl het kwaad wordt als jij ook een keertje ‘poef’ zegt? Deze vragen – en nog veel meer – komen aan de orde in TONGVAL. In dit boek legt Marc van Oostendorp op een heldere en eenvoudige manier uit welke klanken Nederlanders maken en waarom ze precies díe klanken maken en geen andere. Hij besteedt daarbij zowel aandacht aan de standaardtaal en de traditionele dialecten als het Gronings, als aan meer recente varianten als het Surinaams-Nederlands en de Turkse tongval.”

In het boek TONGVAL heeft Marc van Oostendorp de theorie gelanceerd dat het Nederlands wel eens een in de Middeleeuwen ontworpen kunsttaal zou kunnen zijn. Dit kan natuurlijk ook met het Engels het geval zijn.




Qui convertit faciem suam ad amaritudinem pugnas dies quaerit causas incommoda hostes publice privatimque oportet concludere fecunda causam malorum quae adfligerem tum imminentia nos iacet id, quod falsum circa divina et circa humana conclusa, quae nata est in philosophorum sectasque fecerunt, quia iam olim praescripti sunt in omnibus mandatis de re publica et communi consensu recepta in vulgus. Nam cum ipsa rerum natura sequi actus rationis, si intellectus statim omnia peccata sunt; et forte falsa cuius sedes in intellectus actionibus humanis vim pervertunt.

Cum in alia manu, si viri erit ut mens sana, et steterunt in principiis verum et solidum, non autem ad publicas utilitates consequuntur ingentes et privatum. Non enim tanta auctoritate doctrinae tribuere aestimare parem curam omnem radicatio Contra errores ut cum Christiana religione in primo erat institutus, id est super terram et restituere illud sicut erat primae nobilitatis in admirabile lumen fidei diffusus «non in persuasibilibus humanæ sapientiæ verbis, sed in ostensione spiritus et virtutis ‘ita videamus nunc etiam potentium auxilio omnipotentis Dei super omnia revocare mentes hominum intellegentur discutere tenebras erroris.

Sed divinae gratiae auxilia quibus sapientia fortiter et disponit omnia suaviter, nec contemnendum suppeditavit humanum aut neglecta philosophia uti patet in primis. Quoniam non posuit frustra fecit Deus per lumen rationis in mente humana; tantumque abest ab incendio restinguendo lumine fidei vel addita superessentialis minorans virtutem intelligentiae potius complet et capaces reddit maiora viribus adiecto.

Scimus quidam ordines superestimatione humanae mentis esse ut aliquis intellectus subjicitur divino excidit nativa dignitate impeditosque iugo speciem servitutis multo ac retardatos gradus ad summam excellentiam veritatis impedimentum. Talis idea est omnium falsa atque fallax et ejus solus affectus, quo aequiore animo stultum et ingrati homines data opera necessitudinis repudiandum instinctu eiusmodi veritates, ac rejiciunt divinum donum fidei: unde super fontes omnium bonorum quae influunt e in civilem societatem.

Humanae mentis certis limitibus inclusi et gracilem, multis erroribus obnoxia ignoret multa Sed fides sepositas auctoritate Dei, certissima magistra veritatis quem quisquis sequitur et esse et errore implicatos laqueis dispersi iactamur in unda fluxa fide. Illae igitur quae ad philosophiam studio conveniunt ad obediendum fidei Christianae, non philosopharetur tunc maxime optimus via.

Commentarium: Infernum est aeternum, infernum est aeternum, infernum est aeternum !!!


Hong Cuck


33 points
6 days ago
Treason is capital crime in most countries, including “western democracies” like America.

If HK is really a police state, these people would be sentenced to death or life imprisonment like that American Chinese scientist who was caught leaking research findings.

level 2
8 points
6 days ago
Imagine an American in the US protesting outside the White House with a pic of Xi Jinping saying “please liberate the US”. At the very least they would get arrested for some BS grounds and heavily investigated by FBI counter intelligence. At worse they would get beat the shit up by cops or other pig Americans.



During the early 1530s, Van Batenburg converted to Anabaptism and found himself the leader of a large number of his co-religionists in Friesland and Groningen. His sympathies originally lay with the revolutionary Anabaptists who held Münster during the Münster Rebellion, but between Easter and Pentecost 1535, the Batenburgers from Groningen urged him to declare himself as ‘a new David’. Before long Van Batenburg had established a new and completely independent sect, which quickly became the most extreme of all the early Anabaptist movements.

Bocholt meeting
In August 1536, the leaders of the various Anabaptist groups met in Bocholt in a final attempt to maintain the unity of Anabaptism. At this meeting the major areas of dispute between the sects were polygamous marriage and the use of force against non-believers. David Joris tried to compromise by declaring the time had not yet come to fight against the authorities, and that it would be unwise to kill any ‘infidel’ (non-Anabaptists), lest the Anabaptists themselves be seen as common thieves and killers. Accounts of the outcome of the meeting differ; however, Joris and his followers subsequently split from the other Anabaptist groupings.

Van Batenburg, correctly suspecting that his fervent belief in both polygamy and the use of force would be condemned by other Anabaptist leaders, had stayed away from the conference at Bocholt, although he had sent representatives. He was disgusted by Joris’ propositions, called him ‘the son of a whore’ and threatened to kill him. The rivalry between the two Anabaptist leaders would last until Van Batenburg’s death.

Comparatively little is known of Van Batenburg’s theology. The Batenburgers believed that every man, and everything on earth, was owned, in a literal sense, by God. They also believed that they were God’s chosen children. It followed, in their theology, that everything on earth was theirs to do with as they pleased. There was nothing wrong in making a living by robbing ‘infidels’, by which they meant any man who was not a member of their sect; indeed killing infidels was pleasing to their God. Those who joined the sect after 1535 — when the Münsterite leadership had declared the door to salvation to be closed—could never be baptised, they thought, but these men and women would nevertheless survive the coming apocalypse and be reborn in the coming Kingdom of God as servants of the Anabaptist elite. The Batenburgers also shared the views of the radical Münsterites on polygamy and property; all women, and all goods, were held in common. A few Batenburger marriages did occur, and Van Batenburg himself retained the right to present a deserving member of his sect with a ‘wife’ from the group’s general stock of women. But such unions could be ended just as readily, and on occasion the prophet did order an unwilling wife to return to servicing the remainder of the Batenburger men.

Jan Van Batenburg seems to have commanded the loyalty of at least several hundred men. Members of his sect were required to swear oaths of absolute secrecy, however, and had to endure a painful initiation designed to ensure they would be able to resist torture if they were ever captured, so the true extent of his following never emerged. The Batenburgers did not gather openly in public, and had their leader’s dispensation to pose as ordinary Lutherans or Catholics, going to church and living apparently normal lives in the lands along the borders of the Holy Roman Empire and the Netherlands for several years after the fall of Münster. They recognised one another by secret symbols displayed on their houses or their clothing, and by certain ways of styling their hair. It was only after Van Batenburg himself was captured and burned at the stake, at Vilvoorde, Brabant, in 1538, that they came together at last, transforming themselves into a robber-band and infesting the Imperial marches for at least another decade under the leadership of a Leyden weaver called Cornelis Appelman. By this point the group had been reduced to a core of no more than 200 men, most of whom were joined by bonds of family or marriage.

Appelman remained active until his own capture in 1545. He was considered more extreme than Van Batenburg, giving himself the title of ‘The Judge’ and killing any of his followers who refused to join his criminal activities, or proved themselves lax in killing, robbing or committing arson. Like Van Batenburg, he preached and practised polygamy, with the additional refinement that the women of his sect could leave their husbands at any time should they decide to marry a man further up the Batenburger hierarchy. Appelman himself murdered his own wife when she refused him permission to marry her daughter, and subsequently killed the girl as well.

Closing stages
After The Judge’s death, the Batenburger sect fragmented into several tiny groups, one of which, the Children of Emlichheim, was active in the middle 1550s. Its sole creed appears to have been revenge against the infidel; on one notorious occasion its members stabbed to death 125 cows that belonged to a local monastery. The last of the Batenburger splinter groups, and also the largest, was the ‘Folk of Johan Willemsz’. This sect persisted until about 1580, living by robbery and murder in the countryside around Wesel. When Willemsz himself was burned at the stake, the remnants of the group fled west. A remnant is believed to have found their way to Friesland, where they hid themselves among the local Mennonite community and were eventually absorbed into it.


LG Jansma (1977). Melchiorieten, Munstersen en Batenburgers: een Sociologische Analyse van een Millennistische Beweging uit de 16e Eeuw. Buitenpost: np.

L.G. Jansma (1984). ‘Revolutionairee wederlopers na 1535.’ In MG Buist et al. (eds), Historisch Bewogen. Opstellen over de radicale reformatie in de 16e en 17e eeuw. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
S. Zijlstra (1984). ‘David Joris en de Doperse stromingen (1536-1539). In ibid.
M.E.H.N. Mout (1996). ‘Spiritualisten in de Nederlandse reformatie van de zestiende eeuw’. In Bijdragen en Mededelingen Betreffende de Geschiedenis der Nederlanden 111

Bryan Caplan will likely win his bet…

Bryan Caplan has bet $300 that Europe, and every state of Europe, will survive to 2020. I don’t make these kind of bets, because outcomes tend to be ill defined. What constitutes surviving? But I expect that around 2040, people will look back to around 2020, and say that some substantial portion of Europe, fell back then.

The nation state derives its cohesion from the nation, and the nation is not a patch of land but a people, united by something – perhaps an ideology of governance, economics, and law, but more commonly race and culture, or religion, or some such.

Nation means, still today means, a mutually supporting group of people, not a territory – a people united by culture, or by language dialect, or by race, or by ideology, or religion, or some such. Jews are a nation, Israel a nation state, Kurds are a nation, but Kurdistan is not (yet) a nation state. Iraq is a state, but evidently not yet a nation.

If a state is united by race or religion, the nation state has a disturbing tendency to commit mass murder. Even before the rise of the nation state, even back in the days when nations seldom corresponded to states, the nation was an important and vital part of Europe’s history, leading to lots of disturbingly efficient slaughter – and not just the easy slaughter of disarmed obedient sheeple that we saw so much of during the twentieth century, but the highly successful mass slaughter of armed and united peoples.

Thus a nation state inherently derives its cohesion, its strength, its military prowess from what is now called ethnocentrism, or racism, or bigotry, or ignorant superstition or capitalism/imperialism/exploitation etc.

The transnational progressives are attempting to use the power of the state to suppress that which gives the state cohesion, sawing off the branch on which they stand.

And because they have in substantial part succeeded, Europe suffers from extraordinary military weakness. Europe could not defeat the Serbs, could not defeat the Taliban. The British could not hold the most crucial oil port in the world against Sadr’s forces.

Hence the inclination on the right to predict the collapse of the EU or some of its component states. The prediction seems absurd. The states of Europe have police, tanks, bombers and an immense budget, whereas the various threats to their existence are tiny and have nothing much – but the threats have internal cohesion, and the states of Europe do not.

Source: https://blog.jim.com/war/caplan-bets-europe-will-survive/


trump kemal

Türk imparatorluğu Türk karşıtı imparatorluğa dönüştü ve imparatorluk illeri değil Türkler buna karşı ayaklandılar. Arzu edilen il bağımsızlık hareketleri, Kemal Atatürk’ün Türk’lerin (anti) Türk imparatorluğuna karşı merkezi isyanı ve bunun sonucunda uzak illere üniter hükümeti empoze etmekte olan ilgisizliğinin bir yansıması ve sonucuydu. Trump seçilmeden önce bile, Kemal Atatürk olacağını umduğuma değindim. Belki öyledir.

Source: https://blog.jim.com/economics/brexit/


Op 26 en 27 maart hebben vertegenwoordigers van de federale regering in Genève tijdens de hoorzitting van de VN-CRP-deskundigencommissie over het staatsrapport betreffende Duitsland zo duidelijk gelogen, dat het niet duidelijker kan worden aangetoond.

De verklaringen werden via video opgenomen en vervolgens op internet verspreid.

Zo laat Duitsland zien – hoe gemakkelijk elke staat de martelingen recht kan babbelen en de regeringsfunctionarissen buiten schot kan houden, en op die manier de verantwoordelijkheid van zich af kan schuiven.

Er wordt niet gemarteld, dat zien we zien anders.

Ontkennen is voldoende en het is al geen marteling meer.

Een beter verhaaltje, hoe bondig marteling kan worden ontkend, kon de FRG niet geven.

De domme sprookjes van de federale overheid voor het machteloos maken door de misleidende “zorg”  worden hier bedocumenteerd – met onze ondertitels (zie video hieronder).

Of dit alles door het VN-comité van Genève is begrepen en hoe het wordt beoordeeld, zal deze week worden gelezen in de zogenaamde “Slotbeschouwingen” …

Urdu gedetecteerd

urdu gedecteerdOver Mary Stoops Clinics Mary Stoops International heeft 9 klinieken op verschillende locaties in het VK die ondersteuning bieden aan vrouwen die abortus overwegen. We hebben uitgebreide ervaring op dit gebied en onze artsen en verpleegkundigen zijn experts op hun gebied. Elk jaar wordt ongeveer een derde van de abortusdiensten in het VK uitgevoerd in onze kliniek. We zullen ons best doen om uw bezoek aan uw kliniek comfortabel en comfortabel onder uw zorg te maken

Source: Dat kunt U zelf uitzoeken…