Conlangs and Cultural Appropriation

Many conlangers like to exoticize their language by adding non-European features. But this betrays the same Eurocentric bias as Esperanto does. Esperanto was meant to be a Human language, but ended up as an European language. Klingon was meant to be a non-Human language, but deliberately takes features from non-European languages. The same underlying assumption is that Human = European. The very notion of “exotic” is generally understood to be racist and Eurocentric.

On top of this, is the very fact of taking features of e.g. Dahalo not an act of cultural appropriation? Under the usual rules, yes. This makes about any attempt at constructing languages by people having white privilege thoroughly racist, if not White Supremacist. Think of it, geeks!

Arab women are women as well…

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2013/07/27/why-women-reject-white-nationalism-movement/

Joshua says:

Whoever wrote that article on why women avoid White Nationalism has made a huge mistake in reasoning.

You see, when White Nationalism is realized in its fullest sense it will make no difference what women think of it. Their consent couldn’t matter any less, when it’s a question of survival of our race, and in its most desperate phases of struggle we would long ago have put an end to this feminist fallacy that women are just as capable as men.

We will have no choice but to radically curtail their freedoms in order to keep them safe from Arab pimps and Nigger rapists. Because women don’t have the capacity, nor foresight to avoid such dangerous situations. Only men can protect them, and there is nothing spontaneous or optional about this protection. It is a duty that must be consciously practiced and ENFORCED every step of the way.

I wonder if anyone sought the opinion of women in the midst of the Battle of Vienna? Chances are no one cared when men were valiantly dying in history’s biggest cavalry charge to drive these Mudslimes off our Holy Land.

If the Mudslimes won then our women would have gone to the Arab Harems. And they would have been totally indifferent about it too, the same way many of our Aryan women today are totally indifferent about being part of Jewish Playboy Harems, pornographic videos, and Mudsharking their vaginas around town.

Women don’t determine things, they just go with the flow, whatever is most popular. They are neither moral, nor immoral, but they are AMORAL.

It is men who must answer for their conduct. So shame on the White Man for being such a coward and letting our women become whores! This is really where the blame lies. Especially our fathers who slept their way through the 60s and 70s without once questioning where these Nihilistic values would lead.

When it’s our race at stake, our expectations and standards will be the most popular, not by choice, or any other such stupid democratic wishful thinking, but by NECESSITY. Only a man can enforce such a thing.

Don’t worry about the women in WN, this is a boy’s club. We’re not pandering to women, or feminists notions about inclusion and equality. Feminism has run its course and we’ve seen the full effects of it, now the pendulum must swing the other way. If we don’t out-chauvinize the Arabs then you can kiss your Aryan women goodbye.

We are not the civilized Europe of chivalry anymore, that place died long ago. We are now at a much lower, morally barbaric level. I don’t like it either, but this is environment we must fight in, and the sooner you realize this truth the better prepared we will be for the battle of survival.

The Jews have retrograded us back to a more primitive era with their postmodernism and relativism, and so we must reckon with this in mind.

Confidence

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2013/07/27/why-women-reject-white-nationalism-movement/

Dealbreaker #1: Because they are offended by the people who rail against White women on account of their bad experiences with dating and marriage. They shouldn’t have dated women like that anyway, but take out their sexual frustrations on all women with untenable generalizations.

Dealbreaker #2: Because of the HBD cogelite nerds who glorify Asian women and who denigrate White women. This is one of the biggest pet peeves.

Dealbreaker #3: Because of the aura of negativity that surrounds the White Nationalist movement. Most women can’t stand a constant drumbeat of negativity and self consciously avoid demoralizing websites.

Women like to see confidence in men. When they see men who have no confidence in themselves and who preach an “all is lost” political message, they instinctively turn away from a movement that they perceive as a bunch of losers, especially when they encounter a hostile atmosphere on pro-White websites.

Dealbreaker #4: Because White Nationalism attracts a disproportionate number of geeky, socially awkward males who have Asperger’s syndrome or who are creepy in some way as well as the homosexual misogynists who are on the warpath against women.

Dealbreaker #5: Because there is a lot of crossover between the Men’s Rights community and White Nationalism and this is a turn off to women who are culturally conservative and therefore more likely to be Christians.

Dealbreaker #6: Because the vast majority of women who qualify as “traditional” in America are strongly Christian or religious in some way. They are turned off to White Nationalism because of the atheism, misogyny, and lewd discussions about women on White Nationalist websites.

Anyone who goes to church knows that there are far more “traditional” women than men in America. Among women, it is fashionable in some circles to save yourself for marriage, whereas few men think that way these days. A respectable woman is not going to be dressed like a slut in some bar or club on the weekend.

Dealbreaker #7: Because women will always be less interested in politics than men. White Nationalism focuses heavily on politics and science and less on culture, family, and religion which are subjects which attract more conservative women.

Dealbreaker #8: Because women are more empathetic and are natural conciliators and thus mix like oil and water with the curmudgeons who are drastically overrepresented among White Nationalists.

Dealbreaker #9: Because some White Nationalists practice a type of effeminate political correctness and consciously go out of their way to elevate Asians and Muslims in particular over White Americans.

Comments: Atheism and having a large family is hard to reconcile. If WNs want to stay Atheist, it would make more sense to cull enemy birthrates.

Hunter Wallace doesn’t want positive input

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2012/08/21/the-white-nationalist-proposition-nation/

White Nationalism, as its stands, has four major weaknesses.

-It doesn’t take in account the asymmetry of race-mixing. Non-Whites accept everybody with a non-White father, making their males more attractive to all females, Whites included.

-It treats Muslims as a non-White race, subject to the self-destructive race-mixing rules outlined above. This makes it very hard to deal with the Islam problem.

-It parasitizes on Conservatism, taking their ideas about welfare and crime. Politically Incorrect people are more likely to lose their job and end up in prison. This also alienates the White proletariat and lumpenproletariat.

-It doesn’t understand that the Left considers them Fascists, that is, not eligible to normal democratic or even legal protection. Any non-violence from Fascists is seen as temporary and misdirection, i.e. hudna and taqiyya.

Or does he? We will wait.