Similarities: both cannot stand blood and death

 

Feminists

Neo-Nazis

Comment: Nevertheless, I do not consider abortion nor (other) genocide to be inherently immoral. Sometimes tough choices have to be made, but I am able to stomach both blood and death. I am willing to see the consequences of my actions. I do not hide from truth. Others do, and will burn in hell.

Pedophilia apology 33 years ago: withdrawal of candidacy to German Parliament.

http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/child-sex/pedophilia-apology-33-years-ago-withdrawal-of-candidacy-to-german-parliament

Pedophilia apology, 33 years ago, prompts Dagmar Döring to withdraw her candidacy to the German parliament for the Liberal FDP party.

 

The texts were discovered by researcher Franz Walter, hired by the German Green Party to research their own party’s involvement in efforts to decriminalize child sexuality.

40 years ago, the child sex trauma myth and Voodoo theory had not yet become the religious dogma (Disclaimer). The Rind study had not yet been unanimously condemned by the US Congress and Senate. A decent percentage of Germans practiced nudism at most beaches, rivers. So nudes of all ages could be readily seen during summer. Legal Dutch hardcore porn employed 15 and 16 year old actresses engaging in sex acts. British newspapers had topless 15 and 16 year old page 3 girls.

Dagmar Döhring went beyond Daniel Cohn Bendit. He described how he behaved passively when anti-authoritarian children opened his fly and played with him.

Dagmar Döring stated how she could be only satisfied by a long relation with a girl. Her boy friend had a relation with  13 year old boy that was cruelly ended after it was discovered. Dagmar Döring wrote how she would fight all these unjust cruel laws that criminalized such behavior.

If she were in Britain or the US, she probably would go to prison, once the victims come forward to sue for millions. No real victims are needed. Anyone claiming to have been abused will be automatically believed as there is no due process for those accused of sex crimes.

Human-Stupidity will not take a position towards liberating child sex (disclaimer) But we want to stress the following facts:

 

 

 

More in “Der Spiegel”

Comment: Many people want to forget the past. God will make sure they don’t. Hell is eternal.

Christian Marriage

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/During_slavery_did_white_women_have_sex_with_black_slaves#

During slavery did white women have sex with black slaves?

Answer:

Yes, many white women did sleep with their husband’s slaves although this was not a practice that was openly encouraged by their husbands. It was also not a practice that was socially acceptable or a subject that women discussed with each other due to the social taboo associated with women involved in fornication, so it was done very discreetly.

What many people are not aware of is that the U.S. slave trade, which occurred between 1619-1865, happened during a period when many women were also viewed as property and therefore they didn’t really have a strong voice in the social climate at the time. However, the white men of that era were not restricted by the negative social attitudes that were expressed towards slaves and women.

Although, it should never be thought that white women ever experienced the sub-quality life, the torture, the disdain and the disregard for their God-given inalienable human rights that black slaves were subjected to. For example, many white slave owners forcefully had sex with their black female slaves against their will and desire, which today would be considered rape. White women on the other hand, were never subjected to the repeated rapes, beatings, physical abuse, and the impregnation that black female slaves had to endure by white male slave owners.

Comment: Oh yes, they were. It was called Christian marriage. And Black men were subject to lynchings and castrations, while Black women weren’t.

Minus times minus equals plus

Yesterday an “Anti-Fascist” was killed.  As psycho admits, this is a war, and in a war people get wounded and killed. However, he was also a gay activist. As long as White Nationalists take an uncompromising attitude towards homosexuality, they force people to take such positions. Just like homophobic Muslims force people to become like Alfred Vierling. Minus times minus equals plus. Thus, if you hate homosexuals for not having children, and hate Jews for depressing the non-Jewish/non-Muslim White birthrate (Xorg birthrate), a Jewish homosexual like psycho is a good thing.

The most uncompromising homophobes on Stormfront are Slavs. When I pointed out that this was because Muslim Turks sodomized captured Christian Slav boys, they completely freaked out. However, recently they admitted that this indeed happened. So why not use homosexual Slavs to retaliate against Muslim Chechen and Tatar boys?

https://kafircrusaders.wordpress.com/2013/04/25/muslim-immigrant-denies-the-gay-rape-of-14y-o-boy-in-manchester-shopping-mall-toilet/

 

And even if the homosexuals in question are not into boy rape, the obsession with birthrates is pathetic. Let us face it, many young White men become White Nationalists because they hate to see young Brown and Black men having relations with young White women. They then decide that demographic war is the only way out. Get a young White woman and make a lot of White babies. But this is unfeasable rightly because of the (perceived) scarcity of  young White women. So, before you can even think of a breeding war, you need to wage ideological war.

Is Militant Atheism inherently racist?

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t971025/

 Yesterday, 01:54 AM   #1
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,302
Adelaar is a glorious beacon of lightAdelaar is a glorious beacon of lightAdelaar is a glorious beacon of lightAdelaar is a glorious beacon of lightAdelaar is a glorious beacon of lightAdelaar is a glorious beacon of light
Default Atheist hero a vile racist?

Richard Dawkins? anti-Islam/anti-Muslim propaganda exposed: The facts | loonwatch.com

Quote:
Richard Dawkins’ anti-Islam/anti-Muslim narrative (including the stereotyped caricature and his own convoluted strawman arguments) is essentially identical to the hatred-inciting, theologically-, historically- & factually-distorted/falsified propaganda promoted by Far-Right groups such as the English Defence League and especially the owners ofJihadWatch and Gates of Vienna. This is clearly not just a coincidence, considering Dawkins’ online sources of [mis]information.
Adelaar is offline Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 05:40 AM   #2
Forum Member
Wulfrick's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 468
Wulfrick will become famous soon enoughWulfrick will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Atheist hero a vile racist?

Wulfrick is offline Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:12 PM   #3
Forum Member
Engelskmannen's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Åsgård
Posts: 187
Engelskmannen will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Atheist hero a vile racist?

He’s a good chap. 

Here’s his statement about race regarding an outdated 1972 paper by Richard Lewontin (Zionist Jew ) on race and genetics:

However small the racial partition of the total variation may be, if such racial characteristics as there are highly correlate with other racial characteristics, they are by definition informative, and therefore of taxonomic significance.”

Quote:
If evolution exists (as all atheists surely believe), then all of the different races which evolved over the course of tens of thousands of years in completely different environments on completely different continents couldn’t possibly have evolved to be exactly identical in terms of physical appearance or temperament and intelligence.

Read about convergent evolution. It is possible for your scenario to happen, though not in the case of Human races. 

And please don’t look at evolution in that way. Tens of thousands of years are a blink of an eye in evolutionary terms. 
Genetic diversity (Fst rate and clines/clusters) in the Homo genus is very small, yet alone in Human races.

Despite there being very little diversity genotypically in humans, phenotypically, it’s a different case (see TYR and MC1R expression, and for genotype, see OXPHOS regulation in Europeans)

I will let you decide on temperament and intelligence (white innovation, civilisation and invention should help make up your mind )

__________________

Hvite kvinner, hvite kultur og en hvit Europa!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aggro Saxon View Post
To survive as a race – we must first learn to act like a race.
Engelskmannen is offline Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:38 PM   #4
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 958
makendu will become famous soon enoughmakendu will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Atheist hero a vile racist?

Islam is a religion so how can he be a racist?
makendu is offline Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:40 PM   #5
Forum Member
Engelskmannen's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Åsgård
Posts: 187
Engelskmannen will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Atheist hero a vile racist?

Quote:
Originally Posted by makendu View Post
Islam is a religion so how can he be a racist?

Probably because he can only ever get to debate with Muslims who are Arab and Black. And what do Muslims cry (like Jews) when you critique their religion?…

Engelskmannen is offline Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 12:52 PM   #6
Forum Member
Aureolus's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Newfoundland,Canada
Posts: 403
Aureolus will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Atheist hero a vile racist?

Quote:
Originally Posted by makendu View Post
Islam is a religion so how can he be a racist?

It’s just them trying to silence him.

Aureolus is offline Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 01:02 PM   #7
One of only 100,000 Rhodesians
whitepowermetal's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bromsgrove, West Midlands, England
Posts: 2,130
whitepowermetal is a glorious beacon of lightwhitepowermetal is a glorious beacon of lightwhitepowermetal is a glorious beacon of lightwhitepowermetal is a glorious beacon of lightwhitepowermetal is a glorious beacon of lightwhitepowermetal is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Atheist hero a vile racist?

Dawkins is a racial realist just like most of us here

He doesn’t hate other races he just understands that a society cannot function properly if it is divided racially

whitepowermetal is offline Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 02:44 PM   #8
Spieß voran
Ian Vikingson's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Where the eagles fly
Posts: 4,760
Ian Vikingson has a reputation beyond reputeIan Vikingson has a reputation beyond reputeIan Vikingson has a reputation beyond reputeIan Vikingson has a reputation beyond reputeIan Vikingson has a reputation beyond reputeIan Vikingson has a reputation beyond reputeIan Vikingson has a reputation beyond reputeIan Vikingson has a reputation beyond reputeIan Vikingson has a reputation beyond reputeIan Vikingson has a reputation beyond reputeIan Vikingson has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Atheist hero a vile racist?

Well, to be perfectly fair, he doesn’t like ANY religion. I guess that means that all Atheists are racists by their “logic”? 
Ian Vikingson is offline Reply With Quote
Old Today, 10:24 AM   #9
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,302
Adelaar is a glorious beacon of lightAdelaar is a glorious beacon of lightAdelaar is a glorious beacon of lightAdelaar is a glorious beacon of lightAdelaar is a glorious beacon of lightAdelaar is a glorious beacon of light
Default Re: Atheist hero a vile racist?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Vikingson View Post
Well, to be perfectly fair, he doesn’t like ANY religion. I guess that means that all Atheists are racists by their “logic”? 

LoonWatch is a Muslim-run site. Harun Yahya(the best-known Muslim Creationist) does state that Darwinism is inherently racist.

Adelaar is offline Reply With Quote

Comment: Yeah, Atheism is nice to destroy the worshippers of the three gods, but then those Atheists discover certain religions are even further from Atheism, and then things go wrong. Also, note the ideas of Darwin himself.

Is Blanket Opposition to PUA and Game a Form of Male Sexual Trade Unionism?

http://theantifeminist.com/is-opposition-game-male-sexual-trade-unionism/

I’ve recently been having a rather unfruitful discussion with Emma the Emo over the extent to which men’s rights supporters should avoid ‘being just like feminists’.  She sees my belief that female sexuality is ‘mal-adaptive’ as akin to radical feminists describing all men as rapists.

Anyway, to be fair, the discussion did get me thinking a little over what would count as men’s rights supporters being ‘as bad as feminists’.  Primarily, given that I consider feminism to be a (female) sexual trade union, what would count as a men’s rights movment becoming  nothing more than a ‘sexual trade union’ for men.

First of all, I have no objection in itself to men forming amongst themselves a ‘sexual trade union’ to combat the feminist version that is responsible for the current rape of male sexuality, and the criminalization and destruction of untold thousands of men around the world.

Another of my readers – Ian – recently remarked that if it comes down to a battle between organized men and organized women, ‘the vagina will win’.

Actually, that’s not true.  If men did organize themselves in the way that women have, and actually took on women, it wouldn’t even be a battle.  It would be a massacre.  A bloodbath.  As we all know, the problem is getting men to form a male union that can defend itself and ‘fight’ women, and whether we are even psychologically or genetically capable of doing so.  The fact also remains, that women HAVE organised themselves into a political army that seeks to crush men, and men have not even shown up on the battlefield (hopefully, we are starting to finally do that with the MRM).

Does male opposition to PUA and Game count as a form of sexual trade unionism?

I am inclined to say yes, and a not very effective, moral, or intelligent trade union at that.

The feminist sexual trade union seeks to further female sexual power, in particular female sexual market value.  This applies to the vast majority of women.  Even young attractive females arguably have their sexual power and choices diminished by the presence, for example, of ubiquitous free internet porn that serves as a substitute or alternative for a relationship with her, or at least distracts male attention away from her.  The fact that most active members of the Sexual Trade Union (i.e. feminists) are middle-aged ugly crones, might be in large part due to the fact that political power invariably resides in the hands of older people, male or female.  In fact, young women vote or economically franchise these feminists into power, as do middle-aged females.

However, no doubt a middle-aged feminist telling a young prostitute or porn actress, earning an upper middle-class salary for work she enjoys and freely chooses, that she is being ‘exploited’, is transparently an example of a (large) subset of females retaining sexual power at the expense of other (a much smaller subset of) females.

PUA allegedly gives men increased sexual choice and hence power over attractive women.  On the surface, men, and certainly men’s rights activists, should welcome this.  However, this is not the case.  The reasons given of course will be that ‘PUAs are frauds’, ‘PUAs teach men to be pussy beggers’ etc.  This sounds suspiciously like the older feminists telling the young porn star that she is being taking advantage of.

And the demographic of the ‘PUA hater’ does indeed appear to have a vested interest in limiting sexual choice for the ‘PUA’.  Namely, the male opponents of Game appear to be largely older men and/or wealthy men who are no longer in the market (at least not without paying or without committing long term), and also young men who suffer from a lack of looks, status, or personality, who have ‘tried pua’ and found it didn’t help them to overcome those natural disadvantages.

No doubt the power of PUA and Game to change any man’s sex life has been massively exaggerated, not least by the PUA gurus hoping to sell bootcamps and e-books.  However, for a young man with average or better looks, but non optimal social skills, general PUA advice can certainly help him get laid more often than he otherwise would (PUA detractors will still say that the advice that works is just ‘common sense’).

PUA allows average young men to take more of the pussy pie.  And of course, it is young men who already enjoy a greater share of that pie.  PUA essentially teaches young men not to stay in a committed relationship, that having sex with lots of decent looking women is possible.

Obviously, if you are autistic or below average height, or ginger haired, even being 25 wont help you walk up to attractive girls and get them into bed after a ‘neg opener’, or even to get a flakey phone number from them.  If you are 60 years old, you will still have to pay for the premium pussy in some form – no amount of Game is likely to help you.  In fact, you are more likely to have to pay given that the young attractive females have more young men chasing them with the knowledge and ability to get them into bed for free.

Thus PUA is good for ordinary young men with average or above average looks, not so good for everybody else.

Now most of my regular commentators are, like me, past 40.  Most of them appear to be quite strongly opposed to PUA.   Similarly throughout the men’s rights movement – it is older guys like Paul Elam who are most vehemently opposed to PUA, while it is the younger MRAs who support it.

Is this a form of sexual trade unionism, and what is my opinion of this?

As I said, I do not object to sexual trade unionism in terms of men finally banding together to stand their ground against the gynocratic privileging of female sexual needs, even if it means ‘being as bad as feminists’.  However, if opposition to PUA is a form of male sexual trade unionism, it’s likely to be a short-sighted and unproductive form of it.  This is because it is primarily seeking to diminish the sexual choices of younger men so that older men may benefit.  It is men with low sexual market value trying to raise their own sexual market value at the expense of other men.  In particular, other men who are likely to form the bedrock of any sex positive men’s rights movement that has the capability to take on feminism.

The question ought to be asked by men’s rights opponents of PUA : Is my sexual power threatened more by feminism or by Game?

 

Why you can’t have capitalism without racism

Capitalism indoctrinates people to think that all poor people are lazy, stupid, and even immoral. Capitalism teaches that people are unequal. So as soon as people see that certain groups are poor, they will draw the conclusion that these groups are lazy, stupid and even immoral. Capitalism wants to be able to employ or to sack people without having to worry about disparate impact. Colorblindness would prevent people from seeing people as belonging to certain groups, but wouldn’t change the status of the members of these groups. Capitalism is, however, necessary for the ruling class to make profits. Liberalism is a dead end, but Radicalism is internally consistent.

Should children be allowed to retaliate against their parents?

http://www.alice-miller.com/index_en.php

Child Mistreatment, Child Abuse

What is it?

Humiliations, spankings and beatings, slaps in the face, betrayal, sexual exploitation, derision, neglect, etc. are all forms of mistreatment, because they injure the integrity and dignity of a child, even if their consequences are not visible right away. However, as adults, most abused children will suffer, and let others suffer, from these injuries. This dynamic of violence can deform some victims into hangmen who take revenge even on whole nations and become willing executors to dictators as unutterably appalling as Hitler and other cruel leaders. Beaten children very early on assimilate the violence they endured, which they may glorify and apply later as parents, in believing that they deserved the punishment and were beaten out of love. They don’t know that the only reason for the punishments they have ( or in retrospect, had) to endure is the fact that their parents themselves endured and learned violence without being able to question it. Later, the adults, once abused children, beat their own children and often feel grateful to their parents who mistreated them when they were small and defenseless.

This is why society’s ignorance remains so immovable and parents continue to produce severe pain and destructivity – in all “good will”, in every generation. Most people tolerate this blindly because the origins of human violence in childhood have been and are still being ignored worldwide. Almost all small children are smacked during the first three years of life when they begin to walk and to touch objects which may not be touched. This happens at exactly the time when the human brain builds up its structure and should thus learn kindness, truthfulness, and love but never, never cruelty and lies. Fortunately, there are many mistreated children who find “helping witnesses” and can feel loved by them.

Comment: There are two ways to prevent child abuse by parents. Create an external organization, like the government, to deal with this, and risk that this external organization starts owning and then abusing the children, or, give children the right to retaliate in adulthood against their parents. Like abortion, so euthanasia.

Apex alpha enabling alpha

http://occamsrazormag.wordpress.com/2013/05/26/human-biodiversity-and-functional-socialism/

In pre immigration sweden most white males cannot afford a family, and have been so severely emasculated by the state that most girls much prefer Muslim males, despite the fact, or more likely because of the fact, that Muslim males, reasonably enough, treat them as the worthless whore trash that they are, with the result that the majority of children are fatherless, and a startlingly large proportion of those children are half caste, how large a proportion is a tightly guarded state secret, much as in the US the proportion of mortgage defaults that resulted from loans to mestizos and blacks is a tightly guarded state secret. (In the bay area, the proportion of defaults that resulted from loans to mestizos and blacks near the height of the bubble was over 99%)

  • Yes, but the white fatherless males from neighbourhoods full of Muslims could seduce Middle-Class girls and impregnate them (easy to do as they are more alpha than the MC wussies), and shift the problem upwards.
    Also, do these girls understand the Muslims are protected by the state, and more importantly, the Antifa? So why not take an Antifa boyfriend? The same holds even for Muslim girls. Why aren’t Antifa-activists entitled to Muslim girlfriends? After all, they enable the alpha of the Muslim boys, so they should be apex alpha.

    • Why aren’t Antifa-activists entitled to Muslim girlfriends? After all, they enable the alpha of the Muslim boys, so they should be apex alpha.

      Previous to dominion of leftism with its overclass/underclass alliance, middle class people physically dominated lower class people, and upper class people physically dominated middle class people. Personal violence was allowed, but the higher your class, the more friends and connections you could call in if you lost. Further, the higher your class, the better armed you probably were, and the better trained in physical violence you probably were.

      This has been reversed, as the police just don’t particularly want to bust members of the underclass – it is dangerous and there is no profit in it, and the consequences of coming to police attention are far more damaging the higher your class.

      This leads to phenomenon of the ruling underclass – that the underclass have privileges that were historically associated with the aristocracy and high status. These privileges cause girls to feel an exciting tingly sensation in their vagina.

      See Mencius Moldbug “A theory of the ruling underclass

Comment: Yes, but my point is that the alpha of Muslims is enabled by others. As we see that women understand that they are, in fact, married to the state, and not to the “husband”, and act on it, it would be logical for women to start relationships with the enablers. But maybe we should point this out to these women, as the Antifa doesn’t act in the open. Anyway, Antifa-activists are very unequally yoked with Muslims. It is mainly Muslims who benefit from the alliance, as the Left doesn’t need voting cattle; they do not care for majority-rule; one-man, one-vote.

In order to break any overclass/underclass alliance, use the reasons for protection of the underclass against the overclass, and the reasons for rule by the overclass against the underclass.  Why do the heavy lifting yourself?