Target-rich environment

2015 - 1 (2)2015 - 1IMG_20150701_003153

IMG_0222

Who exactly is it who doesn’t have anything to lose? Even if the Gulf States have far more and far better planes and even far better pilots, one single hit by an European bomber or missile can do a lot of damage. Also, starving the West of oil could mean a rise of the BRICS-countries, from the frying pan into the fire. Note that bombing raids in retaliation against European cities would mainly hurt Muslim immigrants and their liberal elite protectors, that is, the much-hated doctrine of collateral damage.

Cf. catapults during the siege of Ta’if.

http://en.islamtoday.net/node/1651

catapult

The targets intended by the catapults were clearly not civilians, women, or children, though there was a remote possibility under those circumstances that some civilians could have been injured unintentionally. This, however, is quite different than intentionally attacking civilian targets, women, and children. Any direct attack against such people is categorically unlawful and had been expressly prohibited by the Prophet (peace be upon him).

Many internet tough guys call for the nuking of Mekka, while ignoring lesser targets like Tetouan, El Hoceima, and Smir, overlooking that conventional weapons are useful enough, and don’t leave radiation damage and such. They lose all sense of proportionality, while the wimpy maggots freak out at a simple knife and couldn’t even get a handgun if their eternal salvation depended upon it. The internet tough guys are more likely to be nuked, or struck by drone-launched missiles themselves.

That said, I don’t believe in a bilateral Clash of Civilizations. The next conflict will be multipolar.

Don’t even think of nuking Mecca!!!

mecca-toast

Nuking Mecca is expressly forbidden, according to my religious views. Even fancying the thought will lead to eternal damnation.

Voluntary euthanasia of people is morally acceptable, so people who consider any euthanasia intrinsically wrong will be damned as well. Ironically, involuntary euthanasia would pose less of a problem for most religions, who fear that allowing suicide would lead to everybody killing themselves in order to get in Heaven.

Hell

Hell is eternal, Hell is eternal, Hell is eternal…

 

Avenge the Pyramids, avenge Black African Heritage

http://www.raymondibrahim.com/11973/calls-to-destroy-egypt-great-pyramids-begin

“Now, however, as Bahrain’s “Sheikh of Sheikhs” observes, and thanks to modern technology, the pyramids can be destroyed. The only question left is whether Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood president is “pious” enough—if he is willing to complete the Islamization process that started under the hands of Egypt’s first Islamic conqueror.”

As we can see, Muslims destroy Black African heritage. All Black Africans should rethink Islam. Black Africans should demand reparations from Arabs. The oil sheiks fear Israeli nukes, so they will comply.

http://vladtepesblog.com/?p=50133

This will not go well with Afrocentrists. Actually, regardless whether Muslims will become enraged or not, nuking Mecca becomes a moral and religious duty. Mecca is the idol of the Muslim. The very fact that Mecca has to be protected or avenged, proves that it is an idol. After all, that is the logic Muslims use when they attack someone else’s religious stuff. The destruction of Mecca proves that the Muslim will burn eternally in hell.