The very word “Anti-Fascism” was coined by Josef Stalin. He founded an explicitly Jewish group devoted to fighting “Fascism”. For obvious reasons he didn’t use the tag “National-Socialism”, just as the National-Socialists didn’t accuse their competitors of “Socialism in One Country”, but of “Judeo-Bolshevism”. A Hezbollah/Al-Qaeda fight if there ever was one. Self-declared Anti-Fascism thus started with Stalin. Nevertheless, many views of Stalin, especially his tolerance of a certain amount of Nationalism, would make him a Fascist according to the criteria of the self-declared Anti-Fascists of today. His actions against Muslims, like Chechens and Crimean Tatars, would be declared to be beyond the pale of Islamophobia. Hypocrisy is a two-way street, and it is no use to hold people against their Stalinist past, if I don’t admit a nuanced view of Josef Stalin myself, and even a certain admiration. In particular his cunning is to be praiseworthy. In the past, I attacked “Anti-Fascists”, without using scare quotes. This caused confusion. I will coin a new word, and hope it will catch on.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Originally Posted by psycho
a sustained campaign is something else than throwing a brick to a window or posting a threating letter, these kind of actions need to happen as a tactic in a wider campaign amids a pluformity of tactics. which is also my main criticisms of RF, they focus to much on these kind of actions and not enough on the other necessary stuff.
these kind of actions, targeting the leadership, the enablers, the financiers should happen in tandem with mass blockades of demonstrations, investigative journalism, outreach towards both immigrant communities and the young angry white youth, propaganda, education on schools etc etc.
But, RF combines all of these things actually…maybe not under RFs own name but…
In the text in the video it says the fascists will stop being attacked when they stop trying to split the working class.
Comment: Islam splits the working class in Muslimeen and Kuffar. Judaism splits the working class in Yehudim and Goyim. Anti-Racism splits the working class in Oppressed and Oppressors. Only Colorblindness doesn’t split.
Either the migrants are proletariat and the non-migrants are labor aristocrats, or the migrants are lumpenproletariat and the non-migrants are proletariat. So one or the other are inherently reactionary and useless to the class struggle. Sakai takes the first position.
There is a curious similarity to National-Socialists and many, if not most, White Nationalists, who hold the position that class struggle divides the Aryan/White race. If the assesment of the economic situation by Communists/Anarchists is right, it is the white bourgeosie that wages class struggle against the white proletariat, dividing the white race. If the assessment of the racial/religious situation by National-Socialists/White Nationalists is right, it is the non-white working class that wages race war against the white working class, dividing the proletariat.
Of course, the Communists/Anarchists are intellectually one step ahead of their enemies, and, if they do not outright dismiss the charges as “racism”, they explain the behavior of the non-white working class as being caused by “racism”, i.e. systematic discrimination by employers on the job market. But then the non-white working class and their Communist/Anarchist allies should put pressure directly on the white employers, not on the white working class. And the white working class is under no obligation to end job discrimination. The onus for this rests on the non-white working class and their Communist/Anarchist allies. After all, they put the blame for the social problems like rioting in Sweden on “racism”.
But the other side of the political spectrum doesn’t get a free lunch either. They should understand that white employers are all too happy to deny jobs to “neo-nazi skinheads”, and are even more ardent in this than in the discrimination of non-whites. Fouad can’t get a job, but SSHooligan1488 really can’t get a job. So don’t consider the capitalist class to be your natural allies, you boneheads!!!
Aussies hold pro-Gaza rally in Sydney
Daniel Pizarro, Press TV, Sydney
Despite the Israeli-Hamas ceasefire remaining intact, protesters staged a mass demonstration in the Australian city of Sydney against Israel’s week long bombardment of the Gaza Strip.
But a scuffle broke-out when a protester tried to remove a banner made by a group of neo-Nazis who attacked the rally.
Gazan citizens continue to celebrate the end of Israel’s deadly week-long bombardment of the Palestinian exclave that claimed the lives of many Palestinians and drew condemnation from across the world.
Although a truce has been declared, it did not prevent people turning out at the Sydney Town Hall to slam Israel’s actions against Gaza, before marching to the American Consulate.
Reverend David Smith says international support for Israel has been damaged and there’s the need for proper talks.
The protest was overall peaceful, but just before it began, masked figures claiming to support Palestine, but in reality were neo-Nazis attempted to gatecrash the demonstration and a scuffle broke out when one protester attempted to grab the Nazi’s banner. Police intervened and kept both groups separated from each other.
With the truce holding, the Gazans celebrating the end of hostilities and the Israelis turning back to their election campaign, the question of whether or not more fighting will break out is on everybody’s mind and these protesters are determined to back Palestine all the way.
Although not precisely National-Socialists but National Anarchists, they do not understand that the Palestinians get a lot of support from Muslims and Leftists, the latter making the former look peaceful and tolerant. They don’t need National Anarchists or the like. They can afford to spit them in the face. Finally, the National Anarchists understand the need to mask themselves.
The same holds true with the silly marches against pedophilia. The National Anarchists should seek allies in unexpected places.