Canaanite child sacrifice and euthanasia

We read in the Bible that the Canaanites sacrificed their children, as well as ran around naked, and engaged in sodomy. The Canaanites are not accused of euthanizing their elderly. This can mean two things. Either they didn’t euthanize, or the Bible doesn’t have a problem with euthanasia. In the first case we see that these values inevitably lead to a screwed up demography. And not just that. Abortion is far more at odds with the Golden Rule than is euthanasia. If the fetus is not human, if the fetus is a parasite, then the elderly suffering from dementia are doubly so. Abortion is always without consent of the fetus, while euthanasia can be consensual. Everybody agrees that the Golden Rule doesn’t apply to those who break it. Conservatives believe murderers deserve the death penalty. Liberals believe fascists deserve a beating by antifascists. This solves the question how to square the demands of large families (no abortion) with the demand not to attack your neighbours (large families can require wars of aggression). Both people who consider abortion not as bad as euthanasia and people who consider euthanasia a less important right than abortion are highly immoral. They are either cowardly or oversexed (or both). If anyone qualifies for conquest and genocide, it is them.

If the Bible doesn’t have a problem with euthanasia (possible if we see the cases of Abimelech and Samson, supported by the fact that the Old Testament is rather vague about the Afterlife), it is obvious that the Bible agrees with me.

Canaanite child sacrifice: good or bad?

Good: Less Canaanites

Bad: Child sacrifice is inherently immoral

What is it, Jews, Christians and other followers of Abrahamic religions? Should people who don’t follow Abrahamic religions have large families as well, or shouldn’t they? Hell is eternal.

Socializing is dangerous to your enemies

The elites destroy socializing for two reasons. Socializing leads to uncontrolled information flow, especially politically incorrect ones. And socializing leads to strong social bonds. Without strong social bonds, people become victim to groups who do have strong social bonds. It is well known that Muslims are very able to summon fellow Muslims against non-Muslims, not just White non-Muslims, although non-Muslim Whites are by far the easiest prey. This is even more important than large families. This is the reason Muhammad placed strengthening the family bonds on the same level as fighting idolatry. It could be very well the reason why Islam forbids alcohol. It leads to places for socializing that compete with mosques.