The Dark Future of Israel

http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/08/demographics-and-jewish-destiny-part-1/

The thing is though, WR, that 70 % of Israel is now non-white.

And even among Ashkenazi, most of the newborn are of extremist ultra-orthodox Jews.

Secular Ashekanzi Jews, the backbone of the intellectual stream within World Jewry, are disappearing with stunning speed in Israel both due to lower birth rates as well as to intermarriage which is now at 40 % or so between secular Ashkenazi and secular Mizrahi.

So if Jews immigrate to the Western world, they will be far more foreign due to the fact that Israel already today, at least among it’s young, is far more Arab than European.

This will also make it harder for Ashkenazi American Jewry to support it, especially as Israel continues on it’s religious right-wing turn and while the secular left, which is the dominant theme in American Jewry, is now completely obsolete inside Israel.

Only 25 % in Israel identify with the left according to a recent Haaretz article. And among youths, it’s even lower. That is pretty extraordinary, since young people tend to be more left. Imagine how this generation of Israeli Jews will be when they’re 50? If they even get to that.

The biggest threat to Israel isn’t the Occupation(although it’s a major problem) nor external enemies. It’s the changing demographics, and the lowering of intellectual achievement and cultural closeness with the diaspora.

White intermarriage in the States is 9 %. And that includes intermarriage with white Jews, Asians etc.
Dysgenic intermarriage is probably around 5 % give or take a percentage point.

Now imagine if we had a 45-50 % intermarriage rate with blacks. Not blacks with us, butwe with them. (Of course, we’d have to massively import wives and husbands from Africa in the tens of millions, but this is for a thought experiment only).

This is the equivalent of what the Ashkenazi are doing in Israel. Sure, Mizrahi have higher IQs(around 94 or so), but they’re still very poor in intellectual achievement.

Comment: This will prove troublesome to Saudi-Arabia, as Israel is its main ally. How are darker people treated in Saudi-Arabia, like Ethiopians and Sudanese? Hell is eternal, Hell is eternal, Hell is eternal…

Israel is not a normal state. Here’s why.

http://tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/190139/is-zionism-racism?

I am a person of the left and have been ever since I was a girl and Jackie Robinson joined the Brooklyn Dodgers or maybe it began when the Rosenbergs were executed and I knew a great lynching had occurred or maybe it was the photos of Auschwitz that I saw in Life magazine that made it clear I was one of those inside the fence not those waving at passing trains. That is why today the phrase “Zionism is Racism” sends shivers down my spine and sets my teeth to grinding.

Zionism is not about race. It is a nationalism. It makes a claim for the Jewish people that they are a folk like other folk and entitled to a land of their own just like the French have France and the English have England and the Bulgarians have Bulgaria. Nations have histories and the Jews have a history, long and eventful, rich in creative moments, overflowing with sorrowful memories, complete with documents, music, stories, language and also religion, and a religious memory of temples bygone and exiles endured and architecture described and columns buried in the soil and a millennium dream of return.

This dream of return, this next year in Jerusalem, existed long before the Holocaust. It existed before Herzl and the Zionists of the century before last had ever taken their first breath. It is a dream sunk deep into the Seder ritual, “Next Year in Jerusalem.” This vision of an end to exile kept the Jews together and brought them hope through the years spent in Babylon millennia ago when the texts that form our memory were edited and scrolls were connected and ordered into a lasting canon.

Sense was made of Jewish misfortune through a vivid if perhaps dubious belief in God’s punishment and eventual forgiveness. If the disasters that befell the Jews came about through Jewish defiance of God’s law then Jews could hope to make amends and keep their religion and their hope of redemption alive.

Even when Jews were defeated in battle we kept our God and held dear the promises he had made us of a land of our own: a land that he had granted to us in the time before time. Other defeated peoples gave up their gods who had performed badly in war and were now no more than broken stones strewn on the bloodied soil. In blaming ourselves for our misfortune Jews were able to hold on both to our God and to the hope of return to the land that had been promised. Our conception of the wages of communal sin saved our God from the dustbins of abandoned texts where specialists can still read today of Marduk and Sargon.

This hope of return to the land of Israel, which God had given to the Jewish people through Abraham, through David, for all time, this hope of return lasted through the exile of our people from England and France, the calamity of the Spanish exile and and of Portugal’s cruel dictates.

A wish for a land of one’s own for a nation of people with a story and a root, and a hope that carried on for more than a thousand years is unusual in human history. But if one thinks for a moment how the French would feel scattered to the four corners of the globe, Paris gone, the Seine named something else, the great cathedrals burned, the people now living along the Seine having descended from other folk who lived in other places, who did not know the French story, did not honor Charlemagne or Joan of Arc, or even speak French and instead spoke strange words in a language that Proust, or Flaubert, or Molière could not have deciphered, think how they might create a nationalism of their own that called for a return of Paris to the French and if that happened would they be racists or would they be nationalists, and why would they be entitled to a land of their own and the Jews denied?

And what if these French were denied citizen’s rights in some of the places they settled? What if they had been gassed or pushed into trenches where they died by the tens of thousands? What if the French had no army, no police of their own and were prey to the anti-French who roamed across all continents. What if the other countries denied the French access to law courts, to medical schools, to universities? What then? The French would start looking around for a land to call their own and they would call their promised land France and if others were living there they would still return if they could, because the French like any other national group deserves a land of their own, in a world of nation-states. And so do we Jews.

In today’s world to be called a racist is to be attacked with a nasty word that conveys immorality and inhumanity on the part of the racist. It hurts to be called a racist, especially if one is not. A Hungarian immigrant may enjoy a croissant but not feel a strong identity with French culture or history. What if such Hungarian immigrants were unexpectedly in the majority in what had been recognized as France? What if the French in Colombia or Nigeria wanted to return to France: Would anyone call them racists or would they be exiles, carrying with them Diderot, Molière, Madame Curie, Charcot, Camus, Stendahl, André Gide, Corneille, on their backs to lands where they had settled?

Despite United Nations resolutions to the contrary Jews are not racists to want a land of their own, a geography that contains their history, a place where their armies and their arms can protect them. They are human beings who claim the common endowment of what in this day and age passes for humanity.

Racists are despicable people who think they are superior to and more entitled than others of different groups, different nations, different skin color, different religious beliefs. America has a lot of racists living in its cities, small towns, its hills, its purple mountains majesty but slowly we are getting better at understanding that America is a place of many races and the mixture itself creates a nation that is beautiful in its variety and has for spacious skies that stretch from sea to sea.

Yes, Zionism can lead to excess of rage. It can inspire folks to deny others basic human dignity, the same way that anyone else’s nationalism can. It can turn ugly when the desire for “mine” becomes the desire to deny “yours.” But that is not the Zionism of the Jewish people. It was not Herzl’s Zionism. Our bid is just to be a nation like the other nations.

Well, not exactly like all the others. It was hoped that Israel would not enslave anyone. It was hoped that Israel would treat the strangers who lived among its people with justice and equality. It was expected Jews would not throw rocks at passing Arab cars and that we could make room for other dreams and other visions and other nations to settle near by or live in peace among us.

Zionism remembers the vulnerability of the Jews living without a state of their own and so it balances the needs of others to thrive in their own orchards and the needs of the Jewish community to become itself, at last, a nation without a foreign ruler, without a wicked king appointed by a distant empire, but a place where the Jewish story can be told by free men and women with confident voices in safe places where their Jewish children can learn and grow without fear. In other words a nation just like the French or the Spanish or the Poles who are not racist for waving the French, Spanish, or Polish flag or singing the anthem they learned at school.

If this return had happened in 1776 then the state of Israel could easily have acted in the way that America did—a way that came to be viewed, rightly or wrongly, as “normal.” It could have marched its Palestinians out beyond its borders and the crime of it, the pain of it, would have lost its immediacy, no cameras, no reporters on the ground. Native Americans were stripped of their land and their culture trampled and no one saw it on the news and by the time anyone could weep for them, the deed was done and could not be revoked. America had slaves for a hundred and fifty years and was indeed a racist country and remains so in some places. Think of the faces of the men and women who lined up to mock the entrance of a few Black children into a white school in Alabama. That is the face of racism.

If Israel was a normal country like Iraq or Syria the ultra-Orthodox would be at war with the citizens of Tel-Aviv who go to the movies on Shabbat. The followers of this rabbi or that would take to the hills with their guns. If Israel was a normal country like Mexico its citizens would be afraid of the police and the drug cartels would appoint the chief of police. If Israel were really normal the Ashkenazi Jews would arm themselves against the Sephardim and civil war would take the lives of Jews just as civil war decimated the population of young men in America as boys lay dead on battlefield after battlefield, leaving mothers to grieve and sweethearts to weep and children to grow up without fathers. That is our normal.

So, it might be not such a good idea to be a normal state. And while it might not be entirely fair to hold Israel to a higher standard, I do in fact expect that Jews will hold back the killing hand, the truly racist call, and that Zionism would be, could create a decent place, where a variety of religious approaches could co-exist and secular folk could walk about unmolested. It is a dream, but not an impossible one.

This vision of Israel (that is where as a child I thought my tree was growing) did not fully understand that Palestinian Arabs were or would become a people with a claim of their own to a national homeland. This conflict needs to be settled; both peoples need settled borders in which to build and flourish. But Zionism is not racist to speak for itself and the illogic, the unthinking hatred behind that slogan, makes me sick. It is a lie and a smear hiding behind a proclamation of seeming virtue. To be against racism is good but to see it where it is not, to use the word to attack Jews, is appalling.

Comment: A person of the left. Well, others have differing opinions. Hell is eternal, Hell is eternal, Hell is eternal…

Edomite Jews and the Sons of Cain

http://www.sherryshriner.com/sherry/serpent-seedline.htm

There are several deceptions in the churches today and one of the most dominant is that Zionism is of the Lord, Zionism means Israel, and we are to protect Israel because those who bless Israel are blessed by the Lord, and those who curse Israel are cursed by the Lord. His words about blessing and cursing Israel are very true, but who is Israel? Is Zionism Israel today?

     Most Christians hear the word Zionism and think of Jerusalem. And it was a clever ploy of those who worship Satan to confuse the terminology of their political agendas to lull the people to sleep and get them to agree to their policies because they sound good. Zionism is a political agenda, but when Christians hear it they think of Biblical Zion and Jerusalem.

     Zionism became a political agenda of the Bolshevik Illuminati to capture the area of Israel for the Antichrist. In fact, their agenda is to rule the world from Jerusalem. When the Battle of Armageddon takes place the Antichrist gathers all the world’s armies to Israel to fight against the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. At that time, the Antichrist is ruling from Jerusalem.

     The agenda started back when the Edomite Bolshevik Jews financed Hitler’s rise to power in Germany to set up the conditions to establish their own Nation of Israel for Illuminati rule and that is exactly what happened with the Nazi Holocaust. Who was behind the holocaust? The Edomite Jews. Why? Because they wanted to get rid of the Torah believing Jews and establish a Babylonian Talmudic Jewish nation in Israel. And that is what we have today with Zionism. Talmudic Jews ruling, pushing the agenda of the New World Order and Illuminati to set the nation up for the rule of the Antichrist.

      Edomite Jews are not real bloodline Jews.

     In Revelation 2:9 and 3:9 Yahweh says that there are those claiming to be Jews, but are not Jews, and are liars. They are the church of Satan, the synagogue of Satan and are worshippers and followers of him.

      And what are they doing today? Conquering the world for the Antichrist to rule from Jerusalem. In every nation, in every major event, the Edomite Jews have been behind it. Although the Edomite Jews dominate Israel today there are a remnant of real bloodline Jews there as well. These are the ones the Lord will protect during the Great Tribulation.

     Look at America today, who is running the White House? The Edomite Jews and Sons of Cain. Who was arrested for treason during WW 2 by Congress for trading with the enemy? Prescott Bush. Who announced the formation of the NWO in America? His son, George Bush, Sr. Who is president of America today? George Bush, Jr. What do the Bush’s have in common with Edomite Jews? They are all part of the serpent seedline of the Illuminati.

     The Illuminati are at the top of two particular races of people known as the Edomite Jews and the Sons of Cain. And it goes all the way to the top where the Illuminati rule directly beneath the Jesuits. The Jesuits answer directly to the Black Pope. The Black Pope position is the real power position in the Vatican as opposed to the “white” pope position. Most think it is the Pope, John Paul II who rules from the Vatican. He may reside there, but the real power in the Vatican is hidden, and it’s in the position known as the Black Pope. Black meaning hidden or secret. Today, Hans Van Kolvenbach, holds the title of the Black Pope. And he is second to none on this earth in establishing Satan’s rise to power. He is literally Satan’s right hand man.

     So what do we have today? The false Jews in Israel being called real Jews. And the real “Jews” not even knowing who they are. We are being led to believe by the churches today that Satan’s chosen are Yahweh’s chosen people. Now are you ready to scream?

     Orthodox, Reformed, and Messianic Jews disown the Jews running Zionism in Israel today. Not only are they Edomite Jews, but they are also known as the Khazar Jews as well. In 692 A.D. the Khazar Kingdom was established.

      These were people that had adopted Judaism as their official religion because of the real Jews that lived among them and proseletyzed them. From that point on they passed themselves off as real Jews with a right to Palestine as their homeland. They are not lovers of Yahweh but haters of Him. They are of the same ancestry of Esau whom the Lord hated. The offspring of serpents of whom the Lord told them straight out were of “their father the devil.” It was those of this seedline that instigated His crucifixion.

     They had infiltrated as the Pharisees in Jesus era and still dominate the “Jewish’ nation today. And these are the ones the churches believe are the “chosen” ones of the Lord. If they did 5 minutes of research into Israel today they would realize their error. Instead, they keep recycling errors and falsehoods week after week, month after month, year after year.

     We are told by our churches that we must support Israel or the Lord will bring His judgment on this nation when it is the fact that we are supporting them that IS BRINGING His judgment on this nation. Israel today is the prophecy of evil figs of Jeremiah chapters 21-24 and the evil fig tree that Yahweh cursed. He wasn’t cursing His own people, but those He hates, the serpent seedlines of Esau and Cain.

     Jesus said, “Verily I say unto you, If ye have faith, and doubt not, ye shall not only do this which is done to the fig tree, but also if ye shall say unto this mountain, be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; it shall be done.” Mountain is often symbolic of government or authority.

     The evil fig tree is the false Jews, the chosen people of Satan. He’s telling us to rid the earth of the authority of the Edomites and certainly not to support it. But are we doing? Sending millions of dollars in financial aid and weapons to them yearly. Do you see the irony now? Do you see WHY judgment is coming to America?

     If the Edomites are the ones inhabiting Israel today and the ones who call themselves Jews and are not, who and where are the real Jews? Scattered. America IS Israel. We are the tribes of Israel scattered all over this country along with the other white nations. The Jews of old were not dark skinned people. Noah was platinum blonde with blue eyes, David was ruddy with red hair. Ruddy meaning he had flushed cheeks, he could blush. Dark skinned people don’t blush, neither are they born with blonde or red hair.

      Esau is also described as ruddy and hairy. The Israelites back then were a white race. And who are the white races today? I’m not saying this to be racist I’m just telling you how it was and is. It was Noah’s grandson Canaan (from Ham) who was the father of the darker skinned races, even the Arab races of today, Sheba and Dedan etc..were linked to Ham through his son Canaan.

     If you read in Ezekiel 37:12-14 & 23 the Jews are not in the land of Israel today, they will not being regathered into the land, and will not be until the Lord returns. So the whole façade of Israel returning to their land in the last days is not true. When the Lord returns He will regather His people from the ends of the earth to the land of Israel and not until then. So who are the ones there now? The imposters.

     Haven’t you ever wondered why Yahweh hated Esau? Before he was even born? Why would the Lord make such a statement? Because there are many things that He hates and Esau was one of them (Mal. 1:3, Rom. 9:13). He hated the serpent seed.

Cain, The Serpent’s Seed

     But before we get to Esau, let’s talk about Cain. In Genesis 3:15a He said, “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed.” Enmity means mutual hatred. He is saying there is mutual hatred between the seedline of Satan’s and the seedline of Eve’s. So there are two seedlines. The serpent seed started with Cain and Adam’s seed started with Seth. No matter how they have tried to cover it up in the KJV, the Dead Sea Scrolls and even verses such as Gen. 3:15 make it clear that Satan had his own seedline and it started back with Eve.

     Many of you are hearing this for the first time. Because if you have sat in church programming all of your lives you haven’t heard the truth even though it is right there in the Bible. The apple was figurative for sexual relations masked with the terminology “Eve was beguiled by Satan” and until people accept it as the truth it is, they will stay blind to the real war going on today which is between the serpent seedline and the rest of the human race.

    Beguiled used in this text is the same as “seduced.” Furthermore, Scripture says Cain “was of that wicked one” he was a son of Satan’s through the seduction of Eve. The term “of” is the same that means offspring. Neither is Cain listed anywhere in the descendents of Adam which strongly indicates Cain was not his son. The official beginning of the wheat and the tares began with Eve. The wheat AND the tares.

    Most church pastors today will pull out Genesis 4:1 which reads, “And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord.”

     There are many omissions and translation errors throughout the Bible. The Dead Sea Scrolls confirm that Genesis 4:1 was tampered with. In fact the passage should read:

And Adam knew his wife Eve, who was pregnant by Sammael (Satan), and she conceived and bare Cain, and he was like the heavenly beings, and not like the earthly beings, and she said, I have gotten a man from the angel of the Lord.

    Now we know that anything of the Lord is confirmed elsewhere. IF Cain was indeed Satan’s son, we wouldn’t have to count on just one passage to prove it.

     In fact there are many:   I John 3:12 “Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his (half) brother..” Here the word “of” in Greek is #1537 in the Strong’s Concordance. When used implying a person, it means “a son of or offspring.”

Compare this with other translations:

The New Testament in Modern English: “We are none of us to have the spirit of Cain, who was a son of the devil..”

Living Bible: “We are not to be like Cain, who belonged to Satan..”

New English Bible: “..unlike Cain who was a child of the evil one..”

New Century Bible: “Do not be like Cain who belonged to the Evil One.”

New Jerusalem Bible: “..not to be like Cain, who was from the Evil One..”

     And the popular commentaries confirm the same thing:

     The Wycliffe Bible Commentary page 1473: “He (Cain) is said to have belonged to the family of the wicked one.”

     Matthew Poole’s Commentary on the Holy Bible, volume 3, page 936. “Which showed him (Cain) to be of that wicked one, of the serpent’s seed: so early was such seed sown, and so ancient the enmity between seed and seed.”

     Matthew Henry’s Commentary, volume 6 page 1077: “It showed that he (Cain) was as the firstborn of the serpent’s seed..”

In John 8:44 Jesus was speaking to the Pharisees and proclaimed, ‘Ye are of your father the devil..” The term “of” meaning generation, offspring. They were of the physical seed of their father the devil.

    Trees are often used as metaphors in regards to people. Jesus was the “tree of life.”

We also find:

Mat 3:10 And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

Mat 7:17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.

Mat 7:18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither [can] a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

Mat 7:19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

Mat 12:33 Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt: for the tree is known by [his] fruit.

Now back to the Garden of Eden. In Genesis 2:16 we read:

And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, “Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

     In Genesis 3:3 Eve says to Lucifer the snake,

And the woman said unto the serpent, (Nahash), We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

     Adam and Eve had been commanded not to eat of or touch the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. In Genesis 3:13:

“And the Lord said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.”

      In Strong’s, #398 the term “eat” means to eat, also to lay. The term “touch” in Strong’s is #5060 which means naga, to touch, also to have sexual intercourse. Both terms had and have sexual connotations to them.

     The tree of knowledge was the means to sexual knowledge. Knowledge is to “know.” Knowing means to perceive, experience, learn. It is also used as an euphemism of “to know someone” sexually as when Adam “knew” his wife. The terms eat, touch, and know are often used in Biblical lingo for sexual relations. Lucifer was the way of knowing good and evil. He was the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil because through him they would learn evil, they would perceive evil, and they would experience it.

     Who was the tree of life in the Garden of Eden? Yahshua was. Who was the tree of the knowledge of good and evil? Lucifer. How do we ‘eat of the tree of life?” We commune with Him. We are never to commune with Lucifer, and in this instance he seduced Eve, impregnated her, and began his own genealogical offspring and seedline on this earth that is part of us today.

     Before Adam even had a chance to consummate his relationship with Eve, she was already pregnant with Lucifer’s child, Cain. And that is what the Illuminati bloodlines of the New World Order don’t want you to know. They are Cain’s seed, of the wicked one. And it is these bloodlines of Cain and Esau working together through the control of vast wealth around the world that are bringing the Antichrist to power.

The Parable of The Wheat and Tares

     The parable of the wheat and tares is found in Matthew 13:24-30 and 37-43. Sandwiched in between in verse 35 is the proclamation: “I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world.” Jesus then revealed the significance of the parable as meaning He (Yahweh) had fathered the good seed (wheat) and that the tares belonged to the wicked one, they had been fathered by Satan.

Verses 24-30:    The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field:     But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat and went his way.     But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.     So the servants of the house-holder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? From whence then hath it tares?     He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?     But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.     Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.

     In verses 38-43 Jesus gives us the meaning of the parable:

He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man;    The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one;     The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels.     As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.     The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity.     And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.     Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

     There were several declarations made in this parable that the churches often ignore.

1. The good seed were fathered by the Son of Man, Son of Adam.
2. The good seed, Adamites are the genetic sons of Yahweh.
3. The tares (Cain’s seed) are the Genetic sons of Satan.
4. The enemy that fathered the tares is the same serpent of Genesis 3:15
5. The sons of Adam (wheat) will then inherit the Kingdom after the tares (sons of Cain) are destroyed.

Again, as stated in verse 38, “The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one” This is not only a physical lineage, but a spiritual one as well.

Yahshua told the Pharisees of His day, “..ye are not my sheep..” in John 10:26. In Josephus, Wars 2:8:2 Jewish Historian Josephus makes it quite clear the Pharisees and Sadducees were not Israelites by birth:

For there are three philosophical sects among the Jews. The followers of the first of whom are the Pharisees; of the second the Sadducees; and of the third sect, who pretends to a severer discipline, are called Essens. These last are Jews (Judah) by birth, and seem to have a greater affection for one another than the other sects have.

     The real Jews of Jesus’s day had absorbed those with contaminated Edomite hybrid blood, and therefore these could claim both Abraham and Isaac as their fathers.

    The wheat and the tares will continually throughout time grow and live together until the end of the age when the angels will separate them. What about the flood? The seedline started over again with Ham and his wife’s offspring Canaan.

Esau, the Serpent Seed

     There are two different groups of people throughout the Bible and our past, present, and future. Those who are elected to grace while the other is elected for wrath and destruction. These are two specific groups with two specific elections and only they can hold these elections, no one else is like them.

     It is a specific seedline? No. Although it may sound like it means just that, it does not mean that all. That would be like saying all those born into a cursed seedline are doomed for hell and all those born into Yahweh’s chosen seedline are awarded heaven.

     There are three major aspects that come into play at all times in regarding all things. The choices Yahweh makes, the choices Lucifer are allowed to make, and the individual choices we make.

     Esau was born of a good seedline but he chose to go the way of the wicked. Just as those born of cursed seedlines can choose to go the way of the righteous. Do we choose or are we chosen ahead of time to do exactly what we do? Yahweh knows the end from the beginning and He knows those who are His and those who are not because He knows exactly what is going to happen. And He places His chosen vessels of honor anywhere He wants to, good or bad seedline. And Lucifer will do the same thing, except his vessels are of dishonor.

     Some say the whole war started with Jacob and Esau, when it actually goes back to Cain, and in these last days it is going to culminate as the seedlines of Cain through the Antichrist will try to destroy and annihilate the seed of Jacob.

     Remember it was Esau who married into the cursed Cain race, corrupting his seed and offspring. He wasn’t born into a cursed seedline, he turned his back on his good seedline and went the way of the wicked.

     The seed of Jacob is both the House of Judah and the House of Israel, the 14 tribes. We (America) are part of Israel folks. Now don’t go off into the British Israelism theory because it is flawed and serves the purposes of the Illuminati who are trying to claim the British throne goes through King David when it’s been sabotaged over the years and especially the only ones on the throne there now are imposters.

     If you look at much of the scattered tribes of Israel today they include Germany, France, Britain, America, and others..the predominant white races of the world. America itself contains a mixture of all the tribes of Israel here and many of us are linked to one of the sons. Manasseh is dominate in America, the 14th tribe of Israel while Britain is Ephraim. Reuben is France, Dan is Greece, etc..

     The Gentiles relate to the House of Judah and the House of Israel as those who have converted to Yahweh (for those who do). The entire last days war puts the gentiles (other races) in the middle of a war between Satan’s people and Yahweh’s people. It is a war to see who will rule from Mt. Zion in Jerusalem with Satan working through his seedline and Yahweh working through His to see who wins. Well if you have jumped to the back of the book you know who wins, Yahweh does. But Satan will be allowed to attempt to rule the world for 42 months before he is utterly demolished by the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

     If you read in Genesis 25:21-23 the war started back in the womb of their mother, Rebekah:

“And Isaac intreated the Lord for his wife, because she was barren: and the Lord was intreated of him, and Rebekah his wife conceived.And the children struggled together within her; and she said, If it be so, why am I thus?  And she went to enquire of the Lord. And the Lord said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.”

    The twins in her womb were Jacob and Esau. They were already at war with each other then, fighting in the womb, for the Lord had ordained them as two different types of people that would be at war with each other. One would be stronger than the other and the elder would serve the younger. Esau, being born first, would serve Jacob.

     And if you read the story of Esau and Jacob, Esau selling his birthright to Jacob for a bowl of red (Edom) pottage (lintel beans) it was because the birthright meant nothing to Esau, he despised it. What was the birthright? Bringing forth through his seedline the redeemer of Adam, Jesus. Esau did not care about it and Jacob was willing to deal and deceive to get it, it meant everything to Jacob.

     Esau despised his birthright, and Yahweh despised him. Esau was determined to go his own way and do his own thing and that is what he did. In Genesis 26:34-35 we read how he committed his own seedline to eternal ruin and becoming “Sons of Perdition,” even as Judas who betrayed Jesus was. Not only did he give his birthright away to Jacob, he broke the hearts of both Isaac and Rebekah by taking Hittite women as his wives. The Hittites were descendents of Heth, and Heth was one of the sons of Canaan, a cursed seed. Canaan was a son of Ham, and father of all Canaanites including the Hittites. These people were a cursed seed because of what Ham did to his father, Noah.

And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without. And Noah awoke from his wine, and KNEW WHAT his younger son had done unto him. And he said, cursed be Canaan Gen. 9:22, 24-25.

     Another event covered up by figurative language. The actual sin was an homosexual act Ham committed on Noah and then laughed about it to his brothers. When Noah awoke from his drunken state, he “knew” what Ham had done to him and cursed not Ham himself, but his offspring Canaan.
The Hittites were the power brokers in the known world, much as today.

      They controlled most of the economics (money) and merchandising (corporations) and were a very powerful influence. They were worshippers of Satan and had much wealth. When Esau married Hittites he created high treason against the Most High by adulterating his holy seed with the serpent and cursed seed. He sold his birthright for red pottage, mixes his seed with the serpent seed, and by doing so condemns himself and his entire offspring to the Lake of Fire (tares).

     Judas who betrayed Jesus was of the serpent seedline as well. He and the Antichrist are both called “Sons of Perdition.” Perdition means eternal ruin. All of Esau’s descendents were sons of perdition, sons of eternal ruin. Jesus said that Judas was a devil (John 6:70). Sons of Perdition are Satanic spirits sent to this earth by their father Satan. They were prepared and chosen for destruction through their Election before they were even born.

     The end of the story of the birthright blessings for Jacob and Esau are rather prophetic and an overall picture of the last days. Esau, realizing there was money to be had from being the firstborn included in the blessing, runs off to prepare meat for Isaac who is going to give him his birthright (nevermind he had promised it to Jacob when he realized there was money involved. He was going to go back on his promise with Jacob). But Rebekah heard what was going on and helped devise a plan to where Jacob could deceive Isaac into believing he was Esau and give him the blessing that Esau had traded Jacob for over a bowl of red pottage. After realizing Jacob had already received Isaac’s blessing, Esau begged for a blessing as well, as part of his blessing Isaac told him:

“And by the sword thou shalt live, and shalt serve thy brother; (be under his authority) and it shall come to pass thou shalt have dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck” Genesis 27:40.

     And the war continued between Jacob and Esau. In Genesis 27:41 we read:

“And Esau hated Jacob (enmity) because of the blessing wherewith his father blessed him: and Esau said in his heart, The days of mourning for my father are at hand; then will I slay my brother Jacob.”

     Jacob was determined to kill Jacob. Jacob had hit Esau where it hurt the most. Jacob got the wealth as part of the birthright he had taken away from Esau. That is probably why Esau married Hittite women, because of his lust for power and wealth. And that seed is the same way today. They control the money around the entire world.

     They are called Edomites because of Edom, the color red, which is what the bowl of pottage was. Esau was also very red/ruddy and hairy. And to this day it is still their mission to kill Jacob. Esau never succeeded in killing Jacob, but to this day the war continues and the seed of Esau, the Edomites seek to get rid of Jacob’s descendents, which are primarily today’s Christians and believers in Yahweh. Jacob’s descendents became known as Israelites.

     Esau’s descendents also became known as Reds, which is also seen as the symbolic color of Communism. All of the “isms” were created by the serpent seed such as Socialism, Nazism, Humanism, Liberalism, etc.. and are the backbone of the first beast of Revelation 13 which is the same scarlet colored beast mentioned in Revelation 17 with seven heads and ten horns.

     Also notice the prophecy that Isaac gave Esau that he would live by the sword and take dominion over the earth. In Rev. 13:10 we read the first beast lives by the sword, will take dominion over the earth, and will die by the sword. Same seedline.

    It is the New World Order and Zionism that carries the serpent seedline today. It is ruled in the background by the Illuminati families of the Serpent’s seedline. It is Satan’s master plan to bring the entire world under a global government through the New World Order so he can rule.

     Satan’s seed will make war against the Lamb’s seed (believers, Israelites and Judahites) “these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire.” Rev. 17

     Today, the world banking Edomite/Hittite/Canaanite/counterfeit Jews under Satan’s rule control the world’s economy and preparing the world for global government and the rise of their master, Satan as the Antichrist.

     In the book of Obadiah there is a prophecy written to the serpent seedline of Esau for the last days.

The pride of thine heart hath deceived thee, thou that dwellest in the clefts of the rock (they hide themselves away from public view with their underground bases), whose habitation is high (world authority, political authority); that saith in his heart, Who shall bring me down to the ground (arrogance of their power and strongholds)? (verse 3)      Though thou exalt thyself as the eagle (Illuminati symbol), and though thou set thy nest among the stars (space stations and planetary bases), thence will I bring thee down, saith the Lord. (verse 4)     How are the things of Esau searched out! How are his hidden things sought up! (Esau is working through deception and lies and keep their real plans hidden from public view). (verse 6)     Shall I not in that day, saith the Lord, even destroy the wise men out of Edom (the Learned Elders of Zion, which rule behind the scenes)., and understanding out of the mount of Esau? (authority) (verse 8)     And thy mighty men, O Teman, shall be dismayed, to the end that they may be cut off by slaughter (the Lord’s judgment on them when He returns). For the violence against thy brother Jacob shall cover thee (war on the saints), and thou shalt be cut off forever..(verse 9)     But, upon mount Zion shall be deliverance, and there shall be holiness; and the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the Lord hath spoken it. (verse 18)     And saviours (judges)shall come up on mount Zion to judge the mount (authority, government) of Esau; and the kingdom shall be the Lord’s. (verse 21)

     Yahweh wins!

     Today the battle rages on between the physical and spiritual. Cain’s seed vs. Yahweh’s seed. It may look like Yahweh’s seed is losing during the Antichrist’s War on the Saints but we know that Yahweh Himself will have the last act on the stage called Earth.

     Furthermore, we know the future of the final two characters to come to earth to lead the battle against Yahweh’s people..the False Prophet and the Antichrist. In Revelation 19:20 we read:     

And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.

     And what happens to their master Lucifer Satan? His fate is foretold of in Revelation 20:

And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.   And he laid hold of the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years.    And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.

     Lucifer is chained and cast into the abyss for 1000 years then loosed for a little while to wage one last final attempt against the Most High. After he loses yet another attempt to overcome the Most High, he is thrown in the lake of fire to stay there forever.

     In Revelation 20:10 it says:

And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and false prophet are and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.

     Yahweh told me this in regards to mixing of the seedlines:

Daughter,The mixture of My children with the serpent’s seed was something I allowed to serve My own purposes. Just as I allowed Satan to defile My garden, I allowed him to defile my people. The way to truth and righteousness is through Me. It always has been and it has not changed. My priests served the people, they did not sanctify them or make them whole. I alone can do that.      Todays priests seek to save which they cannot. They lead My people to errors and doctrines of man that cannot save them, nor do they honor or please Me.      Tell them I am the door. There is no other. Those who want Me must walk through My door to Me. There is no other way.      They worship Baal and call him their god thinking I am the one they worship. My judgment will come on this carnal and wicked system of religion. It is not of Me. Religion profits man, worship and sacrifice profits Me. Sacrifice the cares and wants of this world for the cares and wants in Me only and you will never be unsatisfied. I can give you your heart’s desires. This world cannot fulfill you. This world is an endless form of greed and want. Never satisfying, it waxes worse and worse, evil and more evil.      Yes Mithra has hidden through the ages behind every god and he will ultimately rise again to counterfeit Me and My Word. I will reveal this to you because you seek My face, you seek Me, and I will reveal great things to you because you are humble and faithful.      I love you child. Tell them the world had run it’s course, it’s almost time for all the prophecies of old to be fulfilled. Many will never be ready. But stay in Me for I have many things for you to accomplish before the time. Time is short. Daily seek Me so I can use you. I have shown you many things in just a short amount of time. I will show you even more.        I love you My child. If you could only see how much you make Me smile and know how much I do love you, you would never feel or want for anything again of this world. You’re almost there child. Yet you still have things of Me to do in a short time. Be faithful. Be still and hear My voice. I love you, your Father, the Most High.

      Not only has their been a defiling of our seedlines with Satan’s seed, but with other fallen angels as well. Interbreeding has been going on since the beginning of our creation with the Watchers who fell described in Enoch chapters 6 through 10 and Genesis 6:4. They fell before the flood and after.

America is no longer white European majority ruled

http://www.religionnews.com/2015/03/17/grips-jewish-fundamentalism-new-memoir-sheds-light-hasidic-community/

Stephen Lewis

March 23, 2015 at 8:32 am

If Israelis were smarter people they would have seen the future of Zionism as a complete dead end as Palestinians are many in Palestine and the number of foreign Jews willing to live in an army camp of a nation aren’t that many. Democracy will eventually restore Palestinians to control of even Israel as they will out vote Israeli Jews, some say sooner than 2050, and that will spell the end of Israel unless Israel takes Nazi steps to oust Palestinians from Israel and that would mean the real end of America’s, Europe’s and the world’s tolerance for Jewish Zionist fanatics. So any way you slice it, Israel as a Jewish enterprise is facing its End Times along with the religion which loses more members every year. Racism is not fashionable in our times, especially now that America is no longer white European majority ruled.

Comment: Again, raise your hand against my God, and be destroyed. Hell is eternal, hell is eternal, hell is eternal…

Israel restricts RIGHT-wing Jewish activists for Pope’s visit

http://news.yahoo.com/israel-restricts-wing-jewish-activists-popes-visit-185601552.html

JERUSALEM (Reuters) – Israel issued restraining orders against several Jewish right-wing activists on Wednesday, restricting their movements over concern that they could try to disrupt a May 24-26 visit to the Holy Land by Pope Francis.

Related Stories

• Israel puts Jewish extremists under house arrest for pope visit AFP
• Spate of hate attacks as Israel ups security for papal visit AFP
• Vatican calls on Israel to safeguard holy sitesAssociated Press
• Church attacks in Israel “poison” before pope’s visit, cleric says Reuters
• Holy Land cleric: Hate crimes threaten pope visitAssociated Press

Francis will visit Jordan, the Palestinian Territories and Israel during the trip, his first as pope to the region.

An Israeli police spokesman said police and the Shin Bet internal security service handed restraining orders to “a number of right-wing activists” whom they believed intended to cause “disruptions during the pope’s visit and be involved in provocative illegal acts”.

The spokesman declined to say how many activists received the orders. But he said they would not be allowed to enter certain areas “for security reasons” for four days.

Israel’s Haaretz newspaper said three Jewish youths would be barred from Jerusalem starting on Saturday. Two of the youngsters, it said, were students at a seminary near the Cenacle in Jerusalem, the traditional site of Jesus’s Last Supper where the pope will celebrate a Mass.

Haaretz reported last week that Israeli security services feared that Jewish radicals might carry out a major hate crime against the Christian population or institutions to drum up media attention during the Pope’s pilgrimage.

Last week, “Death to Arabs and Christians and all those who hate Israel” was daubed in Hebrew on an outer column of the Office of the Assembly of Bishops at the Notre Dame Center in East Jerusalem.

Francis is due to meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the Notre Dame Center, which is Vatican property located just outside the walls of the old city, on the last day of his trip.

Chief Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi said on Thursday he was not aware of any particular security concerns for any part of the visit. The pope, he said, would shun bulletproof vehicles during the trip and use a normal car so he could be as close to people as possible.The last papal journey to the Holy Land was by Francis’s predecessor, Pope Benedict, in 2009.

(Reporting by Jeffrey Heller; Editing by Mark Heinrich)

Israel begins deporting Sudanese, Eritrean asylum seekers

http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article50094

February 25, 2014 (KAMPALA) – Israel has begun deporting African asylum seekers from Sudan and Eritrea to Uganda, according to reports by an Israeli news outlet.

Tens of thousands of illegal immigrants from Africa protested in Tel Aviv in January, calling for changes to Israel’s policies on asylum seekers (Photo: Uriel Sinai/Getty Images)

Quoting senior government officials,Haaretz reported that over the past months dozens asylum seekers had either left or agreed to leave Israel for Uganda.

The state does not forcefully deport citizens of Eritrea due to the danger they face in their repressive home country known as the North Korea of Africa, and in the absence of diplomatic relations with Sudan the country is also unable to facilitate deportations of Sudanese nationals there.

However, the government has upped its monetary incentive to Africans to leave under its “voluntary departure” scheme from $1,500 to $3,500.

Eritreans Sudanese are among the largest migrant group, accounting for 80% of the 53,646 asylum seekers from Africa in Israel.

Last June, it emerged Israel’s High Court of Justice had reached an arrangement with an unnamed third country that would agree to accept asylum seekers from Africa.

At the time, the state refused to discuss the arrangement, while the Ugandan government denied the existence of such an agreement.

The UK’s Guardian newspaper said Uganda agreed to the deal in exchange for agricultural technology and arms.

HUMAN RIGHTS CONCERNS

Israel has been reluctant to grant asylum-seekers legal standing within its borders amid fears it would spark a fresh exodus of migrants. The government continues to exert strong pressure on migrants to leave voluntarily by either stalling their claims or keeping them in indefinite detention.

Human rights and advocacy groups say Israel’s actions represent a clear violation of international refugee conventions.

The director of the Hotline for Refugees and Migrants, Reut Michaeli, told Haartz last week that as far as her organisation is aware, asylum seekers sent to Uganda will not receive legal status or be issued with documents allowing them to leave if they want to.

However, ongoing uncertainty about their future and the hard conditions at Saharonim and the Holot detention facility, where many asylum seekers are incarcerated means many are electing to leave.

According to government figures, 2,612 migrants from Africa left Israel in 2013 as part of its voluntary departure process. Of those, 1,955 were from Eritrea and Sudan.

MASS PROTESTS

There is growing disquiet among asylum seekers themselves in Israel. Earlier this year, hundreds of asylum seekers began a protest march from the Holot detention centre in the desert to Tel Aviv, calling for the release of all the detainees and asking that their asylum applications be processed.

That was followed by a mass rallies in Tel Aviv, in which tens of thousands of African asylum seekers went on strike in protest against Israel’s migration policies, causing widespread disruption to businesses.

In a rare public statement issued during the protests, the UN refugee agency (UNHCR) criticised Israel’s policy on African migrants, calling on the government to seek alternatives to its current system of “warehousing” asylum seekers in detention facilities.

The agency also singled out the partial, temporary protection orders granted to asylum seekers from Sudan and Eritrea for particular criticism, saying the refugee recognition rates of nationals from both countries stood at 70% in other countries.

Israel has granted refugee status to just over 200 applicants since the country was founded in 1948. From 2009 and 2012, when the government took over the assessment of asylum claims from the UN, only 20 claims were approved from the 10,800 submitted. In 2013, Israel examined just 250 out of 1,800 asylum requests and approved none, according to Haaretz.

Meanwhile, Israel’s interior ministry announcedin January that dozens of asylum-seekers, mainly from Sudan and Eritrea, had been voluntarily transferred to Sweden, although it later emerged the arrangement was in fact struck following a special request by the UNHCR.

NO REFUGE

Over the years thousands of African migrants have arrived in Israel on foot after fleeing persecution and oppression in their homeland. Many Eritrean asylum seekers are victims of rape and torture and have survived harrowing ordeals having been trafficked from Sudan to Egypt before escaping to Israel across the Sinai desert.

However, the influx of African migrants has sparked tensions in Israel, with locals blaming them for rising crime levels and altering the Jewish identity of some areas.

A five-metre-high fence constructed by Israel to curb the flow of African migrants was completed in December and has reduced the number of people crossing illegally from 10,000 in 2012 to fewer than 45 last year.

There are reports that the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) cross into the Sinai to deteralso potential asylum seekers before they even reach the border.

Israel offers to help Nigeria find abducted girls

http://news.yahoo.com/israel-offers-help-nigeria-abducted-girls-154257244.html

JERUSALEM (Reuters) – Israel offered Nigeria help on Sunday in locating 200 schoolgirls abducted last month by Islamist rebel group Boko Haram in an attack that has drawn global condemnation and prompted some Western powers to provide assistance.

“Israel expresses deep shock at the crime against the girls,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office quoted him as telling Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan by phone. “We are ready to help in finding the girls and fighting the cruel terrorism inflicted on you.”

The statement did not elaborate on how Israel might enlist in the search, with which British and U.S. experts are also helping. A spokesman for Israel’s Foreign Ministry said he knew of no cooperation efforts under way.

Israel has defense ties with Nigeria, and has provided it in the past with surveillance drones. Last September, Israel was among several countries that sent advisers to Kenya to assist in a stand-off with Islamist gunmen who attacked a mall in Nairobi.

(Writing by Dan Williams; Editing by Mark Trevelyan)

CIDI in shock: Wilders met extreemrechts in zee!

http://www.krapuul.nl/overig/blog/154647/cidi-in-shock-wilders-met-extreemrechts-in-zee/
Die Braunzeitung maakt heden melding van het feit dat Esther Voet van het CIDI in shock is geraakt. Ze heeft namelijk ontdekt dat Wilders heult met extreemrechtse elementen. Daar komt ze wel een beetje laat achter, want iedereen met gezond verstand in zijn of haar hersenpan weet dat Wilders niet alleen heult met extreemrechts tuig maar daar zelf ook toe behoort. En dat is niet sinds gisteren, maar al jarenlang het geval.

Wat Esther Voet en het CIDI werkelijk schokt is natuurlijk het feit dat Wilders nu samenwerkt met antisemitische rechtsextremisten, met de nadruk op antisemitische dus. Hoewel ze daar ook rijkelijk laat achter komt.

Ze geeft er blijk van over de naïviteit van een te vroeg geboren koalabeertje te beschikken als ze opmerkt: “Het is verontrustend dat Wilders als een blad aan een boom is omgedraaid. Altijd heeft hij gezegd niet met extreemrechts in zee te gaan, maar dat gebeurt nu toch.”

Ja mensen het is toch wat. Een extreemrechtse moslimhater die op de avond van de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen het gepeupel staat op te hitsen tegen Marokkanen, die met extreemrechts in zee gaat! Dat had nu werkelijk niemand zien aankomen! Die volstrekt betrouwbare Wilders nog wel, die nooit zijn woord breekt! Dat geloof je toch niet!

Esther Voet meent dat de FPÖ, opgericht door oud-SS’ers, zich nog wentelt in een bruin verleden. Huh? Verleden? Kweetniet hoor, maar volgens mij is het toch zo dat hele volksstammen, onder aanvoering van Wilders en zijn extreemrechtse makkers in Europa, zich nu, op dit moment, in het heden dus, wentelen in de bruine drek.

Wilders laat volgens het stuk weten ‘niet bang te zijn om met extreemrechts in een hoek te worden geplaatst’.
Laat me dat nou niets verbazen.

Was bedeutet eigentlich “rechts” und “links” im Nahostkonflikt?

http://aro1.com/rechts-links/

Ulrich J. Becker, Kiryat Ono, 12. Ijar (27. Omer)

Wann ist die Kurve zu scharf links? Wann koennte man sich ueberschlagen?

 

Ich selbst habe hier schon oft mit den pauschalen Bezeichnungen “links” und “rechts” rumgeschmissen, Journalisten, Politiker, Freude etc. so genannt. Aber wie genau wird sowas im Nahostkonflikt definiert, oder gibt es ueberhaupt keine genaue Definition? Bezeichnet man so Leute einfach, wie es einem gerade in den politischen Kram passt?
Ich will hier mal mit einer ganz banalen Definition beginnen und mal sehen wo einen das hinfuehrt. Also, im Groben kann man ueber Juden in Israel in etwa sagen:

 

Linke sehen die Schuld im Konflikt bei sich selbst, den Juden, und Rechte sehen die Schuld im Konflikt bei den anderen, den Arabern/”Palestinensern”.

 

Fuer linke Israelis ist klar, dass der ganze Konflikt unsere eigene Schuld ist. Unsere Schuld, dass es keinen Frieden gibt, unsere Schuld, dass es besetzte Gebiete gibt, oder sogar unsere Schuld, das es vorher ueberheupt Krieg gab. Ja, selbst der Terror der Palaestinser ist fuer sie im Grunde eine verstaendliche Reaktion auf unser unpassendes Verhalten den Arabern gegenueber.

Um so radikaler man ist, umso absoluter schreibt man diese Dinge dann zu. Sieht der Druchschnittslinke die meisten Fehler bei uns und einige bei den anderen, so kennt der radikale Linke keine Fehler der anderen, sie machen alles richtig, nur Israel und die Juden machen alles falsch.

Aehnlich, auch bei Rechten:

Fuer Durchschinttsrechte hat Israel sich im Grunde korrekt verhalten, waehrend die Araber immer wieder grosse Fehler begingen und begehen. Fuer den radikalen Rechten hat Israel nie Fehler gemacht und macht auch keine und das einzige Problem sind die Araber.

 

Aber dieses Denken bleibt nicht bei den Arabern stehen, sondern bezieht sich auf alle auesseren Parteien. Fuer Linke ist es im Grunde verstaendlich, wenn Herr Obama boese mit Israel ist, schliesslich ist das auch unsere Schuld in Form von Bibi und seiner “rechten” Regierung. Fuer Rechte ist es Obama, der hier ausgetickt ist – ohne verstaendlichen Grund in der Wirklichkeit.

Und im allgemeinen ist Antisemitismus fuer Rechte ganz klar ein Problem, das von Antisemiten stammt, fuer Linke ist es eher ein verstaendliches Problem, dass durch das bloede Verhalten von Juden entsteht. Besonders linke saekulare Juden uebernehmen dieses Arguement gerne gegen ihre religioesen Brueder.

 

Und es ist kein Geheimnis, dass ich mich dem rechten Spektrum zurechne, wenn auch nicht dem radikalen, und behaupte, dass man auch faktisch nachweisen kann, dass sich Israel und Juden im Nahostkonflikt moralisch und praktisch besser verhalten haben und verhalten als die arabische Seite, und dass der Grossteil der Probleme – auch wenn Israel auch mal Fehler macht – sehr wohl auf das aggressive und arrogante Verhalten dieser zurueckzufuehren ist, von Landverlust, ueber Checkpoints, ueber geschlossene Grenzen, ohne jetzt lange ins Detail gehen zu wollen.

 

Und auf der anderen Seite? Bei den “Palaestinensern”, gibt es da auch “Linke” und “Rechte”? Oder besser: Gibt es dort auch “Linke”, die offen behaupten, dass ihr Volk den Grossteil der Fehler gemacht hat und dass Israel im Prinzip richtig handelt???
Warum sind diese so selten wie eine Peace Now Fahne am Strand von Gasa? Wo sind die grossen palaestinensischen “linken” Organisationen, die sich gegen Terror und Hamas und fuer eine Anerkennung des juedischen Staates als einen solchen aussprechen?

 

Ich wage zu behaupten, dass die arabisch-islamische Kultur hier in der Region im Generellen einige Probleme mit dieser Sache namens “Selbstkritik” hat. Sich selbst kritisieren, sich selbst anklagen, sich selbst einer Gewissenspruefung unterwerfen, versuchen eine Situation durch die Augen des anderen zu sehen – dies scheinen sehr schwierige Dinge fuer viele unserer Nachbarn zu sein.

Und das Paradoxe daran: Wie mir auch mal ein eher rechter Taxifahrer in Israel sagte:

 

“Es ist gut, dass wir den Beilin haben.”

Warum? Weil nur so, nur durch Selbstkritik, nur durch Selbstueberpruefung, nur durch staendiges kritisches Pruefen deiner eigenen Taten, kommt man voran, verbessert sich, macht Fortschritte und wird u.a. zur freihsten, moralischsten, modernsten, technologischsten und wirtschaftlichen Demokratie im Nahen Osten. Wuerden unsere Feinde das Konzept der Selbstkritik begreifen und anwenden, wuerden sie vielleicht eine tatsaechliche Gefahr fuer uns werden, denn sie wuerden ihre Angriffs- und Vernichtungstaktiken staendig verbessern – oder aber, wenn sie diese Spielchen namens Selbstkritik genug betreiben wuerden – wuerden sie vielleicht sogar aufhoeren unsere Feinde zu sein, wer weiss.

 

Anyway, hier sei auch vermerkt, dass Selbstkritik ein grundlegendes Prinzip des Judentums ist, vielleicht sogar das Geheimrezept des ‘juedischen Erfolges’. Das Judentum schont keinen seiner Greunder und Fuehrer! Von Awraham, ueber Jitzchak und Jaakov, ueber die zwoelf Soehne des Jaakovs, ueber Mosche, Aharon und Miriam, ueber David und Schlomo (Salomon). Alle diese und noch viel mehr werden im Judentum u.a. sehr kritisch erwaehnt fuer Fehler und unmoralische Taten, die sie begingen. Und das wunderbarste daran: Oft sahen sie es auch selbst ein, wie z.B. der Stammvater Judah der zu Tamar sagte, nachdem er seine unmoralische Tat ihr gegenueber durch Selbstkritik einsah (BeReshit/Genesis 38, 26):

וַיַּכֵּר יְהוּדָה וַיֹּאמֶר צָדְקָה מִמֶּנִּי

“Und Judah sah [sein Fehlverhalten] ein und sagte: ‘Sie hat Recht und nicht ich!’“

 

Und was ist im Islam los? Nur soviel: Weh dem, der EIN kritisches WOERTCHEN ueber Mohammed verliert! Moslems sehen ihn als PERFEKT an, was fuer Juden im Falle der Behauptung, Mosche sei perfekt, eventuell schon einer Gotteslaesterung gleich kommen wuerde, denn Menschen koennen im Judentum nie perfekt sein, sich diesem immer nur annaehren. Perfekt ist eben nur Gott. Auf der einen Seite also ein Modell, dass jegliche Kritik am Religionsstifter auf Strengste verbietet und niemals annehmen wuerde, egal welche Taten er auch beging. Und auf der anderen Seite ein Modell, dass jeglicher menschlicher Arroganz von vornrein einen Riegel vorschiebt, in dem es selbst die groessten seiner Religion als kritikwuerdige Menschen darstellt, und auch kein Praezedenzfall fuer Leute liefert kann, die sich als perfekt ausgeben wollen.
(Daruber wie es die Christen mit Jesus halten, kann jeder selbst nachdenken.)

 

Aber bevor ihr nach all dem Lob der juedischen Selbstkritik noch denkt, ich waere zu Meretz uebergelaufen (Chas we Schalom), eine Warnung vor Ueberdosis: 
Man sollte sich selbst immer kritisch pruefen, richtig, und zwar mit fairen universellen Massstaeben, die man auch an andere anlegt. Und selbst wenn man an sich selbst lobenswerter Weise hoehere ethische Massstaebe als von anderen fordert, sollte man dafuer einfache aber grundlegende ehtische Prinzipien wie Selbstverteidigung und das eigene, freie Ueberleben nicht zu Seite schieben.Bei vielen Linken wird die Selbstkritik naemlich schon zur Obsession und zum Selbsthass. Und wenn es nach ihnen ginge, waere nicht nur der Nahostkonflikt in einer Sekunde erledigt wenn nur WIR es wollten und uns richtig verhielten, sondern auch so ‘stoerende Dinge’ wie das Judentum koennte man unterwegs aufloesen.
Zum Judentum vielleicht ein andermal, aber man sollte einmal aussprechen, was viele Linke eigentlich sagen, wenn sie das Ende des Konflikts alleinig von der juedisch-israleischen Seite abhaengig machen:

 

Sie sagen nicht nur, dass Juden/Israelis doof sind und irgendwie keinen Frieden wollen, sondern sprechen vor allem den Arabern saemtliche Mitwirkung ab.
Sie sind demnach ein neutraler Null-Faktor, ein lebloses, willenloses Ding, das in der Ecke steht und sofort eingepackt werden kann, wenn sich die Juden/Israelis endlich auf das Friedenspaket mit sich selbst geeinigt haben. Viele Linke hoeren es nicht gern oder halten es fuer Zynismus, aber so ein Verhalten, dass die Araber in keinster Weise, nicht einmal als Feinde, ernst nimmt, ist einfach linke Arroganz gegen die, fuer den sie den Anwalt spielen. Im Grunde ist das ein Taschenspielchen nur fuer sie selbst. Zwischen sich und ihrer uebertriebenen Selbstkritik. Die Araber oder ‘Palaestinenser’ und was wirklich gut fuer sie ist, kommt nicht darin vor.
Und so albern es sich fuer manche annhoeren mag, aber Rechte nehmen die Araber oft ernster als Linke, sehen sie auf Augenhoehe, und nicht unbedingt immer nur als Feinde. Ein ehemaliger Fuehrer einer rechten Partei in Israel sagte mir einst, dass er und sein Friedensplan sich im Gegensatz zu den Linken tatsaechlich um das Schicksal der ‘Palaestinenser’ Gedanken machen wuerden, und vielleicht ist es kein Zufall, dass gerade Bibi sich mit seinem Plan des ‘wirtschaftlichen Friedens’ darum bemuehte, dass die Palaestinser momentan ein weltweit wahnsinniges Wirtschaftswachstum erleben und sogar schneller als Israel waechst, was selbst schon wieder im vierten Quartal 2009 mit 4.9% Wachstum Nummer eins(!) in der westlichen Welt war und nur hinter China und Indien lag.

 

Und koennen nun Linke keine Zionisten sein? Ist das exlusiv Gebiet fuer Rechte? Nicht ganz, denn es gibt viele gemaessigtere Linke, die sich sehr wohl um den Erhalt eines juedischen, zionistischen Staates einsetzen, fuer ihn kaempfen, aber trotzdem den Palaestinenser in vielen Dingen Recht geben. Die Frage ist mehr oder weniger, wie radikal sie dabei sind, ob sie Israel als juedischen Staat unterstuetzen oder ablehnen, und wie sehr sie bereit sind seine Sicherheit dafuer aufs Spiel zu setzen. Aber hier kommen wir schon in die echten dicken Debatten…

Kerry Warns of Israeli ‘Apartheid’

http://news.yahoo.com/kerry-warns-israeli-apartheid-231200692–politics.html

If there’s no two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict soon, Israel risks becoming “an apartheid state,” Secretary of State John Kerry told a room of influential world leaders in a closed-door meeting Friday.

Related Stories

• How John Kerry can find success in the ashes of Middle East peace The Week (RSS)
• ‘Pause’ perhaps needed in Israeli-Palestinian talks: Obama Reuters
• For Washington, Palestinian pact not the end of Middle East peace hopes Reuters
• US in ‘holding period’ in Mideast peace talks AFP
• Troubled Mideast peace effort compounds U.S. policy woes in region Reuters

Senior American officials have rarely, if ever, used the term “apartheid” in reference to Israel, and President Obama has previously rejected the idea that the word should apply to Jewish State. Kerry’s use of the loaded term is already rankling Jewish leaders in America—and almost certain to Israeli leaders abroad.

READ MORE Week in Pictures

It wasn’t the only controversial comment on the Middle East that Kerry made during his remarks to the Trilateral Commission, a recording of which was obtained by The Daily Beast. Kerry also repeated his warning that a failure of Middle East peace talks could lead to a resumption of Palestinian violence against Israeli citizens. He suggested that a change in either the Israeli or Palestinian leadership could make achieving a peace deal more feasible. He lashed out against Israeli settlement-building. And Kerry said that both Israeli and Palestinian leaders share the blame for the current impasse in the talks.

Kerry also said that at some point, he might unveil his own peace deal and tell both sides to “take it or leave it.”

READ MORE Watch the Week in 90 Seconds

“A two-state solution will be clearly underscored as the only real alternative. Because a unitary state winds up either being an apartheid state with second class citizens—or it ends up being a state that destroys the capacity of Israel to be a Jewish state,” Kerry told the group of senior officials and experts from the U.S., Western Europe, Russia, and Japan. “Once you put that frame in your mind, that reality, which is the bottom line, you understand how imperative it is to get to the two state solution, which both leaders, even yesterday, said they remain deeply committed to.”

According to the 1998 Rome Statute, the “crime of apartheid” is defined as “inhumane acts… committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime.” The term is most often used in reference to the system of racial segregation and oppression that governed South Africa from 1948 until 1994.

READ MORE Egypt’s FGM Shame

Former president Jimmy Carter came under fire in 2007 for titling his book on Middle East peace Palestine: Peace or Apartheid. Carter has said publicly that his views on Israeli treatment of the Palestinians are a main cause of his poor relationship with President Obama and his lack of current communication with the White House. But Carter explained after publishing the book that he was referring to apartheid type policies in the West Bank, not Israel proper, and he was not accusing Israel of institutionalized racism.

“Apartheid is a word that is an accurate description of what has been going on in the West Bank, and it’s based on the desire or avarice of a minority of Israelis for Palestinian land,” Carter said.

READ MORE A Court of “Miracles”: Canonizing JPII

Leading experts, including Richard Goldstone, a former justice of the South African Constitutional Court who led the United Nations fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict of 2008 and 2009, have argued that comparisons between the Israeli treatment of the Palestinians and “apartheid” are offensive and wrong.

“One particularly pernicious and enduring canard that is surfacing again is that Israel pursues ‘apartheid’ policies,” Goldstone wrote in The New York Times in 2011. “It is an unfair and inaccurate slander against Israel, calculated to retard rather than advance peace negotiations.”

READ MORE Top Taliban Commander Out

In a 2008 interview with Jeffrey Goldberg, then-Sen. Barack Obama shot down the notion that the word “apartheid” was acceptable in a discussion about Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians:

“There’s no doubt that Israel and the Palestinians have tough issues to work out to get to the goal of two states living side by side in peace and security, but injecting a term like apartheid into the discussion doesn’t advance that goal,” Obama said. “It’s emotionally loaded, historically inaccurate, and it’s not what I believe.”

READ MORE North Korea Detains American Tourist

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told The Daily Beast that Kerry was simply repeating his view, shared by others, that a two-state solution is the only way for Israel to remain a Jewish state in peace with the Palestinians.

“Secretary Kerry, like Justice Minister Livni, and previous Israeli Prime Ministers Olmert and Barak, was reiterating why there’s no such thing as a one-state solution if you believe, as he does, in the principle of a Jewish State. He was talking about the kind of future Israel wants and the kind of future both Israelis and Palestinians would want to envision,” she said. “The only way to have two nations and two peoples living side by side in peace and security is through a two-state solution. And without a two-state solution, the level of prosperity and security the Israeli and Palestinian people deserve isn’t possible.”

READ MORE Palestinian Gov. Will Recognize Israel

But leaders of pro-Israel organizations told The Daily Beast that Kerry’s reference to “apartheid” was appalling and inappropriately alarmist because of its racial connotations and historical context.

“While we’ve heard Secretary Kerry express his understandable fears about alternative prospects for Israel to a two-state deal and we understand the stakes involved in reaching that deal, the use of the word ‘apartheid’ is not helpful at all. It takes the discussion to an entirely different dimension,” said David Harris, executive director of the American Jewish Committee, an organization that has been supportive of Kerry’s peace process initiative. “In trying to make his point, Kerry reaches into diplomatic vocabulary to raise the stakes, but in doing so he invokes notions that have no place in the discussion.”

READ MORE Putin Stops Talks With White House

Kerry has used dire warnings twice in the past to paint a picture of doom for Israel if the current peace process fails. Last November, Kerry warned of a third intifada of Palestinian violence and increased isolation of Israel if the peace process failed. In March, Democrats and Republican alike criticized Kerry for suggesting that if peace talks fail, it would bolster the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.

“It’s in the Palestinian playbook to tie Israel to these extreme notions of time being on the Palestinian side, that demographics are on the Palestinian side, and that Israel has to confront notions of the Jewishness of the state,” he said.

READ MORE Observers Snatched In Ukraine

Kerry on Friday repeated his warning that a dissolution of the peace process might lead to more Palestinian violence. “People grow so frustrated with their lot in life that they begin to take other choices and go to dark places they’ve been before, which forces confrontation,” he said.

The secretary of state also implied, but did not say outright, that if the governments of Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu or Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas left power, there could be a change in the prospects for peace. If “there is a change of government or a change of heart,” Kerry said, “something will happen.”

READ MORE Putin’s Pervy Propaganda

Kerry criticized Israeli settlement construction as being unhelpful to the peace process and he also criticized Palestinian leaders for making statements that declined to recognize the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state.

“There is a fundamental confrontation and it is over settlements. Fourteen thousand new settlement units announced since we began negotiations. It’s very difficult for any leader to deal under that cloud,” Kerry said.

READ MORE Obama: I’d Save Drowning Putin

He acknowledged that the formal negotiating process that he initiated and led since last summer may soon stop. But he maintained that his efforts to push for a final settlement will continue in one form or another.

“The reports of the demise of the peace process have consistently been misunderstood and misreported. And even we are now getting to the moment of obvious confrontation and hiatus, but I would far from declare it dead,” Kerry said. “You would say this thing is going to hell in a hand basket, and who knows, it might at some point, but I don’t think it is right now, yet.”

READ MORE John Paul II Crucifix Falls, Kills Man

Kerry gave both Israeli and Palestinian leaders credit for sticking with the peace process for this long. But he added that both sides were to blame for the current impasse in the talks; neither leader was ready to make the tough decisions necessary for achieving peace.

“There’s a period here where there needs to be some regrouping. I don’t think it’s unhealthy for both of them to have to stare over the abyss and understand where the real tensions are and what the real critical decisions are that have to be made,” he said. “Neither party is quite ready to make it at this point in time. That doesn’t mean they don’t have to make these decisions.”

READ MORE Rare Zonkey Born at Mexico Zoo

Kerry said that he was considering, at some point, publicly laying out a comprehensive U.S. plan for a final agreement between the Israelis and the Palestinians, in a last ditch effort to forge a deal before the Obama administration leaves office in 2017.

“We have enough time to do any number of things, including the potential at some point in time that we will just put something out there. ‘Here it is folks. This is what it looks like. Take it or leave it,’” Kerry said.

Related from The Daily Beast