Black Privilege refuted

The only reason Muslims play nice with non-Muslim Black people in Europe and America, is because they think they can recruit them as revolutionaries. Outside the West, when no one is looking, it is mainly People of Color that get abused by Muslims.

http://addisabram.wordpress.com/tag/ethiopian-maids/

Domestic workers, the majority of whom are women, constitute a very large portion of today’s migrant worker population.

Domestic work is the single most important category of employment among women migrants to the gulf states, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Lebanon. 40 60 % of the population in the Arab states of the Gulf region has a foreign background.

The majority of female migrants come from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, the Philippines.

Driven by poverty and conflict in their home countries, women from these countries travel to the Arab states only to find themselves hungry, abused, raped and subjected to conditions akin to slavery.

There are too many stories about ill-treatment and not paying full wages. Most maids, if being paid on time, earn about $100 a month; the minimum wage, for instance, for Kuwaitis is $900 a month. Frankly speaking, there are few stories more tragic than the plight of foreign maids in Arab countries. Those familiar with their circumstances know how much they suffer under cruel employers, so much so that many choose to take their own lives.

Thousands of young Ethiopian women are being enticed to the Middle East and gulf Arab states with the promise of work only to suffer verbal, physical and sexual abuse.

Many of these young women are locked in the house where they work at all times and never given any freedom.

Many suffer ‘mental torture’ telling horror stories. The abuse in the Middle East goes beyond just physical, employed in back-breaking jobs for up to 18 hours a day, girls also have to perform sexual favours, frequently raped.

Suicide cases are not rare. Girls are only allowed to return home by their employers when their contract ends or when they fail to give any service due to sickness or disability.

Many of these young girls return to Ethiopia partially paralysed, insane, with broken backs and legs, in some cases, burned with acid.

According to the US official ranking, states like Bahrain, Kuwait, Iran, Lebanon, Malaysia, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria and Qatar as among the worst human trade offenders.

http://ibloga.blogspot.nl/2007/10/blonde-children-are-coveted-sex-slaves.html

Let us be clear, they kidnap an awful lot more black slaves than they do white slaves. Not that they would not kidnap just as many whites were they able to do so.

The Sudanese Genocide is an ethnic cleansing, by the Arab government of Sudan, of blacks. It includes the enslavement of black women and children for the purpose of sexual perversion and torture. That is part of the mechanism of the ethnic cleansing which is going on in the Sudan.

But, you probably know that.

What’s more, the Sudanese genocide has been going on for about 24 years now. It began as a Muslim purge of Christians. If one is a Christian or a Jew, or a Westerner of any stripe, one ought to be informed on this subject. The Arab Muslim government of the Sudan has killed over 2 million people in the past 24 years.

Again, even if we look at slavery by Muslims, Whites have White Privilege, and a lot of it. In centuries past, Europeans, as Christians, were considered as People of the Book by Muslims, and never as severely targeted as the Animists in Africa, and Hindus in Bharat.

The biggest difference between Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia

According to Adolf Hitler, Jews were emphatically a race. Most Islamophobes will stress that Islam is a religion, not a race. This means that Muslims can convert, unlike the Jews under Hitler. If a Muslim still insists that Islamophobes are racists that want to eradicate 1.5 billion mostly  Brown people, then he has to admit that Adolf Hitler was more honest than the average Islamophobe. That is, he has to hold that Islamophobes are worse, far worse than National-Socialists. Anti-Semites would, at worst, kill twenty million innocent people. Islamophobes would, at worst, kill 1.5 billion innocent people. Again, to repeat, nobody accuses Jews of honor killing, gang rape and female genital mutilation. If honor killing, gang rape, and female genital mutilation have nothing to do with Islam, as everybody tells us, then Islamophobes would be worse liars than Anti-Semites. Also, National-Socialists did not accuse the Jews of Islamophobia. Many Zionists and other Islamophobes generally do accuse Muslims of Anti-Semitism. Another point that proves that Islamophobes, if wrong, are worse than National Socialists. Concluding, putting Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia on the same level is impossible. Considering the massacres of the Crusaders against the Jews, I understand why Jews, for centuries, have sided with Muslims against Christians. Muslims, at worst, will kill Jewish men, but will enslave Jewish women and children. Christians, and their National-Socialist successors, had the habit of killing Jewish men, women and children. The Holocaust is worse than Khaybar. Frothing, foaming at the mouth Anti-Semitism, was only found in the Muslim world after the foundation of Israel, but now it is too late to abolish Israel. It would be considered a victory for Islam,  a sign of weakness, and would only wet their appetite. Now it is too late to repent for Jews, the Muslims are after their blood.

http://midnightwatcher.wordpress.com/2011/05/16/hamas-mp-and-cleric-in-a-few-years-the-caliphate-is-coming-and-a-great-massacre-of-jews/

Hamas MP and Cleric Yunis Al-Astal, May 11, 2011: “The (Jews) are brought in droves to Palestine so that the Palestinians – and the Islamic nation behind them – will have the honor of annihilating the evil of this gang… All the predators, all the birds of prey, all the dangerous reptiles and insects, and all the lethal bacteria are far less dangerous than the Jews… In Just a few years, all the Zionists and the settlers will realize that their arrival in Palestine was for the purpose of the great massacre, by means of which Allah wants to relieve humanity of their evil… When Palestine is liberated and its people return to it, and the entire region, with the grace of Allah, will have turned into the United States of Islam, the land of Palestine will become the capital of the Islamic Caliphate, and all these countries will turn into states within the Caliphate…”

There you have it. The only way the Jews will be safe is if they kill 1.5 billion Brown people. After all, Muslims use taqiyya.

China and Israel

http://www.gloria-center.org/2012/06/in-a-few-years-china-will-likely-be-the-second-most-important-country-for-israel/

There is a remarkable amount of interest in China about Israel and Jews, as I discovered during a trip to China sponsored by SIGNAL, the Sino-Israel Global Network and Academic Leadership.

The most obvious reason is that the Chinese–one important official called it the “little superpower–perceive that Israel in particular and the Jewish people in general have been success stories. Ten or twenty years ago this would have been less unique in the world. But now, sad to say, it stands out more because the United States and Europe, perhaps only temporarily, are not working very well.

Of course, on a strategic level, Israel and China have some differing interests but these are less important than they may appear to be. China wants to have commerce with everyone, including Iran, and is protecting Syria in the international framework.

Yet China has significantly reduced energy imports from Iran in order to show support for the international efforts against Iran’s nuclear drive and clear signals have been sent to Tehran. Clearly, Chinese interests don’t benefit from Tehran having a nuclear arsenal and being a destabilizing force in the region. As for Syria, Israel’s position on whether the current regime should be overthrown has not been unambiguous. The Chinese argue that a radical Islamist government worse than the current one in Damascus may well come to power. That is not clear but the concern is a reasonable one, especially because U.S. policy is supporting the Islamists in Syria.

Israel and China also have many parallel interests, among them the desire for stability in the Middle East and the hope that revolutionary Islamism doesn’t spread. And China’s policy of dealing with all other countries has another side, since it will not let its relationships with Israel be interfered with by any possible Arab or Iranian demands. Indeed, if China decides to become the main customer for Israeli natural gas and oil exports, the Jerusalem-Beijing relationship may be Israel’s most important link, second only to the one with the United States.

Another factor which should not be underestimated is the lack of Chinese prejudice toward Jews and prejudgment against Israel that has become such a huge obstacle for Israel’s dealing with the West.

Most important of all, is China’s emphasis on economic and social development, the priority on raising living standards and achieving national success rather than such typically regrettable goals of expanding their territory, getting revenge for past grievances, and preferring pragmatic solutions to imposing ideological rigidity on problems.

There is a huge amount of cooperation, far more than many people realize, on joint projects. While hi-technology is the most obvious area of such activity, there are many others as well. Energy issues are equally paramount. China shares with Israel a great interest in finding alternative energy sources, not so much due to environmental considerations but to financial and security ones. Some impressive ideas and pilot programs are underway that seem more imaginative and likely to succeed than what I’ve seen in the American debate.

Several Israel and Jewish programs have opened in different universities; students are studying Hebrew and other relevant topics; Chinese bookstores contain multiple volumes about Jewish and Israeli achievements without—unlike some other Asian countries–exhibiting antisemitism. Obviously, those interested in these things is proportionately tiny in the world’s most populous country. But this sector has reached a size significant enough to sustain itself and to influence the broader society.

On a humorous level, when a Chinese colleague told me, whether accurately or otherwise, that his people’s culture entailed always being optimistic and believing in a better future, I responded that the Israeli and Jewish characteristic was to be pessimistic and then make jokes about it.

Seriously, though, there are a number of important points—certainly seen as such by those Chinese who think about it—in common. Among the points that figure on this list are a mutual experience of a long history of civilization, wide dispersion, emphasis on the importance of education, readiness to work hard, focus on family, and suffering of persecution. If contemporary Jews and Israelis have lost some of these values, perhaps renewing them might learn something from China.

Of course, we can have criticisms of contemporary Chinese politics and policies but it is also important not to cling to outdated notions. I certainly don’t claim to be an expert on China—though I once thought seriously of pursuing that career path—but my visits to the country go back to 1974, when the word totalitarian could accurately have been applied.

But China is no longer the country of the Cultural Revolution and the time of great repression. It has turned toward capitalism and opened up a much wider margin of freedom. The real power of personal initiative has been unleashed and the results have been awesome. I doubt whether any country has made such rapid progress in social and economic development so fast in history.

But here’s an equally important point. While these changes are theoretically reversible, I—and a lot of Chinese people—don’t think this is going to happen. A course seems set in which freedoms will continue to expand in the decades to come. Equally, there seems to be a genuine appreciation—as there has been in the West but there certainly hasn’t been in the Middle East—that the old strategies of war to seize territory and empire-building abroad are obsolete.

An Egyptian friend visited China a few years ago and asked a counterpart, “China has been the victim of so much oppression and imperialism. How do you deal with that?”

The response was, “We got over it.” The Egyptian was astonished, but as a liberal Arab he realized that his own society would be far better off if it eschewed the politics of revenge, bitter hatred, and the angry assertion of superiority on the basis of an inferiority complex. Of course, the Arabic-speaking world has unfortunately been moving in the opposite direction with predictably terrible results. In contrast, Israel and China focus on positive national construction, raising living standards, and seeking peace.

What’s important for Israel, then, is to work with this process of events in China rather than to underestimate it isn’t happening or focus only on a negative side that is becoming smaller over time. Given Europe’s regrettable decline and hostility—which should not be overestimated but must be seriously evaluated—looking east seems the sensible global strategy for Israel in the coming decades.

Jehovah’s Witnesses and child molestation

http://en.tengrinews.kz/religion/11006

Please examine the Jehovah Witnesses who go door to door and come on our property.
Many court documents and news events prove that Jehovah Witnesses require two witnesses when a child comes forward with allegations of molestation within the congregation.
It has also been shown that child molesters within the organization usually have not been identified to the congregation members or the public at large.
These people engage in a door to door ministry, possibly exposing children to pedophiles

For more information see: http://en.tengrinews.kz/religion/11006
Use of the Tengrinews English materials must be accompanied by a hyperlink to en.Tengrinews.kz

Large families

Migration is the inevitable result of large families. Having large families forced Europeans to colonialism. As long as the Third World thinks large families are a good idea, they are not in a position to complain about colonialism. By bringing Christianity to the Third World, colonialism lead to large families in that area. Muslims cooperated with Jews and Christians against population control, so they forfeit the right to attack non-Muslim Whites for conquering other countries. In the days of colonialism, non-Muslim Whites had large families. Even nowadays, Muslims tell non-Muslim Whites who complain about large Muslim families, that they should start large non-Muslim White families. But if non-Muslim Whites are going to have large families, they will again invade other countries. In the fifties of the 20th century, Dutch people had large families and immigrated to Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

The Taliban kills development workers who teach birth control.

The reason Obama helps the Muslims against Jews and Christians, is because in the nineties, Jews and Christians allied with Muslims against Population Control.

 Large families make wars of conquest inevitable. That is why Christians invaded America, despite all their talk of “Love”.

 

The main reason why the Elite savagely persecutes stupid and open White Nationalists like Stormfront and David Duke, but protects and subsidizes cunning and deceitful White Nationalists like Planned Parenthood and Margaret Sanger is because the former stress large White families, while the latter stress small Brown and Black families. Not only does Stormfront want large White families, they do not want to live in poverty either. We should remember that Vlaams Belang wants large Flemish families, fully subsidized by the State. A large family shouldn’t result in the slightest decline of living standards, according to Vlaams Belang. Even worse are most large White families. They are generally Judeo-Christians, and think everybody should have large families, and escape poverty, including especially non-Whites. Judeo-Christians consider the Anti-Growth movement to be racist and White Supremacist to the core. It is obvious that the Elite, who wants to preserve Earth as their personal property, takes a very dim view of people who want both population growth and economic growth. Although Muslims have large families themselves, they attack other religions savagely, and have no problem with them being culled by birth control and abortion. This is why the Elite aids and protects Muslims against others. The Pope, on the other hand, does everything he can to prevent birth control and abortion spreading to Muslim lands. The Elite hates the Pope. To summarize, the Elite wants birth control and abortion. Muslims have little problem with birth control and abortion being spread among Christians. Christians, on the other hand, object to birth control and abortion being spread among Muslims. So, for the Elite, the choice is pretty simple.

 

Non-Jewish origins of multi-culturalism

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/06/psychology-of-confidence-multiculturalism-destroys-trust-economic-well-being-happiness-and-social-co.html

 vladtepes2

“Proponents of multiculturalism may think that they are working for more confluent societies with more tolerant citizens…”

Shrieking Banshees !

The LEFT absolutely doesn’t believe this deceit about “more tolerant citizens”.
The LEFT is using multiculturalism to destroy Denmark.
Flooding white Christian European nations with third world barbarians is a deliberate tactic of the LEFT to destroy Nationalism and Western Civilization.
Nationalism and ethnic homogeniety are some of the greatest defenses the West has against the Left and their battering ram, Islam.
There’s a good explanation of this in “Eurabia” by Bat Ye’or.

The LEFT has wanted to destroy white European nationalism since at least WWII and WWI.
White supremecist nationalism as represented by Nazi Germany but also by all the European imperial powers was seen as a threat by the third world but also by the Communists in the Soviet Union and as such it was targeted for destruction by the third world, islam and the communists – thus multiculturism.

Don’t take anythng the LEFT says at face value.
The only people who fall for “Proponents of multiculturalism may think that they are working for more confluent societies with more tolerant citizens…” are the useful idiots and clueless delusional Christians and Jews who believe this “all men are created equal” and Love and Peace nonsense.
The LEFT is using Christianity against the Christians.
Clear eyed Christians and Jews see that Islam is out to slit their throats and sell their children into slavery – and multiculturalism is one of the weapons the Left and Islam use in their war against Western Civilization.

Trying to argue against multiculturalism as if its proponents are sincere but just misguided is a sign that someone is not even aware of the real threat.

It’s way past time to dignify the evil hissing of muslims with the presumption of sincerity.
Best assume that all their so-called arguments are nothing more than Islamic taqiyya.
The same goes for the deceptions of the Left.
Their lies are nothing more than psychological jujitsu.
They try at every turn to use our own Christian charity and morality against us.

Logical arguments about the downside of muslim immigration, no matter how true, are unlikely to sway citizens of Denmark who make the naive assumption that they are dealing with sincere members of their own culture.
The Christian moral arguments that sacrifices must be made to exercise Christian charity towards everyone, even our enemies, are going to take higher priority than the possibility of psychological problems for the generous Danes due to the exercise of that Christian charity.

As true as Nicolai Sennels observations about the downside of multiculturalism are, they are of interest only among natives of Denmark who can communicate with each other with sincerity.
He’d do well to point out that muslims always have ulterior motives and are only using arguments for multiculturism to deceive the Danes and to accomplish their hidden agenda, the conquest of Denmark for Islam.

Jewish Islamophobia and Muslim Anti-Semitism

http://natashajsmith.wordpress.com/2012/06/26/please-god-please-make-it-stop

Libertarian commented on “Please God. Please make it stop.”.

in response to asser hani mohammed:

i dont under stand who you trying to fool muslims religion doesn’t say to kill any people from other religion except to defend your country or religion and we always have the racism againt us and muslims ….any one except israel must not talk about racism because phalastine every day suffering from jewish racism and [...]

Yes, I’m sure that Jewish hate towards muslims is just tiny in respect to what muslims feels about jews. Where are the calls in Israel for wiping out the palestinian territories? Where are the calls for indiscriminately killing muslim children? Do Israel name plazas after terrorists whose only notable act is the senseless killing of innocents? Where is this culture of racism that you speak of? You obviously doesn’t recognize racism when it’s in front of you. Israel may very well harbour some resentment towards muslims, but it simply pales in comparison with the hate that muslims harbour towards jews. Learn the art of self-reflection and enter the 21st century.

Ex turpe non causa

http://barenakedislam.com/2009/06/13/islams-rules-for-having-sex-with-animals/

http://www.answering-christianity.com/bassam_zawadi/sexual_ethics.htm

http://yahyasnow.wordpress.com/2010/06/18/is-sex-with-animals-allowed-in-islam/

You may see critics present literature of Fiqh which explains what a man must do in order to purify himself for prayer after committing the act of bestiality and append such material with lurid and sensational claims such as “ISLAMIC LAWS ON HOW TO HAVE SEX WITH ANIMALS”. Of course, this is downright dishonest

As Fiqh is a science which covers all areas of life (and a whole load of possibilities) you will come across some Fiqh literature explaining what a person must do in order to purify himself after sex with an animal.

It is obvious to the reader that the Fiqh literature is not approving the act of bestiality but just giving rulings on purification after certain events.

To highlight a couple of examples we could look at Reliance of the Traveller (A Shafi Fiqh manual); in its purification section (e7.4) we learn a person must perform ablution if he/she touches the private parts of oneself or somebody else’s private parts. [3]

Of course, the Fiqh manual is not saying it is allowed for Muslims to touch other people’s privates but merely gives us rulings on purification if such an instance occurred.

That is sound reasoning. The very fact that a Holy Book tells you what to do after something has occured, doesn’t mean the Holy Book approves of the deed. After all, the Roman Catholic church says you should go to confession after you sin. Does that mean the Roman Catholic church condones sinning?

Another example. The Talmud states that if you pay a prostitute, the money is considered a gift. Critics of Judaism consider this condoning prostitution. But it isn’t. It means that if you pay a prostitute, you are still not entitled to sex with her. The same is found in Roman law; ex turpe non causa.

 

 

Abrogation

Read on a forum, and cut and paste:

AND all others ( INCLUDING ME~! ) who recommend reading the qur’an,,, Please, RECOMMEND IT BE READ IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER~!,,, The manner in which this terrorists manual is assembled is hodge-podge at best, and deceitful and deceiving at worst~!
ONLY ( IMHO ) by reading it in Chronological order, and paying PARTICULAR note of the Verses of Abrogation ( Surah 2: 106 ) and The Verse of the Sword ( Surah 9:5 )
Surah 2:106 states:
Surah 2:106:
None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar: Knowest thou not that Allah Hath power over all things?
Why would allah not admit to the maturation of his people, rather than refuting what had been given before??? Part of the commentary on this is as follows:
Not all Muslim scholars agree on what abrogation covers. Briefly here was my discovery.

Muslim scholars of old hold to the concept that some ayahs in the Quran abrogate other ayahs in the Quran, but do not all hold to the same set of abrogated and abrogating ayahs.
Other Muslim scholars are of the opinion that the Quran may abrogate the Quran as well as the Sunnah (deed or example of Mohammad) and vice versa.
Some Muslim scholars hold that the Quran abrogates all the previous scriptures, specifically the scriptures sent to Musa and Isa, but not itself.
Some Muslim scholars, especially of recent times do not believe in the concept of abrogation at all.

The Verse of the Sword, Surah 9:5 states,
9:5 When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them. If they repent and take to prayer and render the alms levy, allow them to go their way. God is forgiving and merciful.

But prime to understanding the change in the philosophy of islam is to read the qur’an in Chronological order~!

Research for yourself about Islam, read everything you can, but be aware of false Qurans printed in English these days leaving out what they don’t what unsuspecting Westerners to read , I have heard are circulating, especially in the US.

  Here is a link to the Koran (in chronological order) by Wikiislam click on the blue link to read a chapter. It is important to know that the Koran’s 114 chapters are not in chronological order. There is a doctrine called “al nasikh wal mansukh” (the abrogating and the abrogated) which means that later chapters cancel earlier verses they contradict. Surah (chapter 9) at-Taubah is almost the last revealed and contains exhortations to fight “unbelievers” until they are subdued, especially Koran 9:29.

http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Chronological_Order_of_the_Qur’an

Islamophobia and Anti-Semitism: the differences

http://www.loonwatch.com/2012/06/islamophobia-anti-semitism-everything-old-is-new-again/

http://www.loonwatch.com/2012/06/muslim-youths-again-targeted-with-love-jihad-hate-campaign-in-kerala/

Islamophobia is often compared to Anti-Semitism. “Everything Hitler said about the Jews, X says about the Muslims!”. But everything Hitler said about the Muslims, Muslims say about Zionists and non-Muslim Whites. Hitler accused Jews of lying, Muslims accuse Zionists of lying. The similarities are striking. If it is unacceptable to attack Muslims, why is it acceptable to attack Zionists? Anti-Zionism is just as bad as Islamophobia. A whole group of people, Zionists, are demonized. The Muslim will say Zionists aren’t Jews. But neither are Muslims. Zionists and Jews have more overlap than Muslims and Jews.

Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia cannot be compared, as many victims of Islam ARE Jews. The Muslim may reply that he only targeted Zionists, but many Zionists are Jews. He cannot say that many victims of Jews are Muslims, after all, Muslims in general deny being Anti-Semites. But he will claim Zionists oppress Palestinians. The retort is that oppression of Palestinians is a Anti-Zionist lie. Would the Muslim accuse the Jews of oppression of Palestinians? In general, not. Hitler accused the Jews of oppression. Everytime a Muslim claims being oppressed by Zionists, racists, or the general non-Muslim population, point out that Hitler accused the Jews of oppressing Germans.

Also, noboby accuses Muslims of being a race, of spreading feminism, homosexuality, abortion, pornography, communism or atheism. Nobody accuses Muslims of usury.

Nobody accuses Jews of raping uncovered women, nobody accuses Jews of love jihad and abductions to gain new converts, nobody accuses Jews of imposing burqas on all women, stoning adulterers, chopping of hands and the like. In general, Judaism isn’t associated with forced conversion. Finally, nobody accuses Jews of FGM.

Another important difference is that powerful Muslims make a show of being pious, but powerful Jews do not wear fur hats, black hats, beards, or sidelocks. This is a very fundamental difference.